Calculate Earth's escape velocity using different methods

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating Earth's escape velocity using Newton's laws and the Lagrangian method. Participants explore the relationship between position (r) and velocity (v) through differential equations, emphasizing the need for initial conditions to compute escape velocity accurately. The conversation highlights the integration technique of multiplying both sides of the equation by the velocity, which simplifies the integration process. The use of LaTeX for clearer mathematical representation is also recommended.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics
  • Knowledge of differential equations
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of escape velocity using Newton's laws
  • Learn about the Lagrangian formulation of mechanics
  • Explore techniques for solving second-order differential equations
  • Review LaTeX formatting for mathematical expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those interested in classical mechanics and mathematical modeling of motion, will benefit from this discussion.

Physicsdudee
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
We were asked to calculate earth's escape velocity using methods 1) Newton law of motion, 2) Conservation of energy, 3) Lagrange method.
As to conservation of energy, that is clear, and I got the result (ca. 11.19km/s).
However for 1) and 3) I have no Idea, though I might have a start for 3).
Help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Relevant Equations
F=m*a, Ekin+Epot=const
try.PNG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For 1) you could use Newton's laws to generate a differential equation and apply the relevant boundary conditions.

I must confess I'm not sure what is meant by 3). You can use the Lagrangian to generate either Newton's laws or the conservation of energy (which follows from time invariance of the Lagrangian).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Physicsdudee
Note that the equation
$$m\dot v + \frac{GMm}{r^2}=0$$ is just ##F=ma##. You can't integrate it the way you did since ##r## is a function of ##t##.

How are ##r## and ##v## related?
 
Hmm I mean I know that r and v are related in a way that dr/dt=v and vice versa with the integral.
I could replace the v' in this differential equation you posted with r''.
That would give me a second order differential equation in terms of r, however, if I solve for r, I get a function r(t). How do I get a constant velocity out of this? By differentiating I get a function v(t), but I have no initial condotins to be able to compute v_escape.
 
Physicsdudee said:
Hmm I mean I know that r and v are related in a way that dr/dt=v and vice versa with the integral.
I could replace the v' in this differential equation you posted with r''.
That would give me a second order differential equation in terms of r, however, if I solve for r, I get a function r(t). How do I get a constant velocity out of this? By differentiating I get a function v(t), but I have no initial condotins to be able to compute v_escape.
I'm not sure what you are trying to do. Escape velocity is an initial condition at some initial ##r_0## in order to ensure that ##v \rightarrow 0## as ##r \rightarrow \infty##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Physicsdudee
Hmm yeah that makes sense. Tbh I don't really get the question we were given either. It said that we must calculate escape velocity using the Lagrange equation, that's it. But yeah, I will try to find a way, maybe some idea pops up.
 
Physicsdudee said:
Hmm I mean I know that r and v are related in a way that dr/dt=v and vice versa with the integral.
I could replace the v' in this differential equation you posted with r''.
That would give me a second order differential equation in terms of r, however, if I solve for r, I get a function r(t). How do I get a constant velocity out of this? By differentiating I get a function v(t), but I have no initial conditions to be able to compute v_escape.
The usual trick is to multiply both sides of the equation by ##\dot r##, which makes it easy to integrate. You should recognize the resulting equation.
 
vela said:
The usual trick is to multiply both sides of the equation by ##\dot r##, which makes it easy to integrate. You should recognize the resulting equation.
Thank you for the hint, I had totally forgotten about that trick. I think that made it work:)

try.PNG
 
As an aside comment @Physicsdudee -- please check out the "LaTeX Guide" link below the Edit window. Posting math equations in LaTeX makes them *much* more legible. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K