Calculate grad(\Phi) in r & r

  • Thread starter Thread starter ineedmunchies
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the gradient of the scalar function \(\Phi = \frac{1}{r^3}\), where \(r = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2}\). The gradient is derived using partial derivatives, resulting in the expression \(-\frac{3}{r^5} \mathbf{r}\), where \(\mathbf{r}\) is the vector \((x, y, z)\). An alternative approach using spherical coordinates confirms the same result, emphasizing the need to clarify the distinction between the vector \(\mathbf{r}\) and its unit vector \(\hat{\mathbf{r}}\). The discussion concludes with a correction regarding the interpretation of \(\mathbf{r}\) as a non-unit vector. The calculations and methods presented are validated by participants in the thread.
ineedmunchies
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] grad operation

Homework Statement



Calculate grad(\Phi) in terms of r and r, where \Phi=\frac{1}{r^{3}}

r= xi + yj + zk
r = magnitude (r)

The r cubed term is scalar by the way, it comes out looking bold for some reason.

The Attempt at a Solution



\Phi = ( \sqrt{x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2}} )^{-3} = (x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2})^{\frac{-3}{2}}

grad\Phi = \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial x}i + \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial y}j + \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial z}k

\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial x} \Rightarrow let (x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2}) = u

\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial u} = \frac{-3}{2}u^{\frac{-5}{2}}

\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = 2x

\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial x} = 2x(\frac{-3}{2}u^{\frac{-5}{2}})

= -3x((x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2}))^{\frac{-5}{2}} = -3x( \frac{1}{r^{5}} )

differentials with respect to y and z will be identical except swapping -3x for -3y and -3z.

These will be the terms for i j and k

Giving a final answer of

-\frac{3}{r^{5}} (r).EDIT (again the r^5 term is the magnitude not the vector)

Is this the correct solution? can anybody help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks fine to me.

Another way to go about this problem is to use the formula for grad in spherical polar coordinates (see http://www.mas.ncl.ac.uk/~nas13/mas2104/handout5.pdf .pdf for example). In this case, it will reduce to \nabla\left(\frac{1}{r^3}\right)=\hat{\bold{r}}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r^{-3})=\hat{\bold{r}}\cdot\frac{-3}{r^4} which is the same result.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
r= \sqrt{x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2}}

you will need to rethink your unit vector r.
 
Thank you very much

EDIT: what do you mean phrak? i used the equation you give for the magnitude of r, and it is not a unit vector in my question.
 
Phrak said:
r= \sqrt{x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2}}

you will need to rethink your unit vector r.

His r isn't a unit vector, it is \bold{r}=(x,y,z). The unit vector, which I denoted with a hat, is then \hat{\bold{r}}=\frac{\bold{r}}{r}
 
Thanks, Cristo. my bad. I didn't read far enough.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K