Calculate % Natural Abundance of Carbon-13

  • Thread starter Thread starter pzona
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isotope
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the percent natural abundance of carbon-13 using isotopic masses of carbon isotopes. The user set up two equations: 12x + 13.003y = 12.0107 and x + y = 1, where x and y represent the fractions of carbon-12 and carbon-13, respectively. The user solved for y, obtaining a result of 1.1% for carbon-13, which aligns with expected values. The methodology employed is confirmed as correct for this type of calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of isotopic masses and natural abundance
  • Familiarity with setting up and solving systems of equations
  • Knowledge of atomic weight and its significance in chemistry
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of isotopic distribution in elements
  • Learn about the significance of atomic weights in chemical calculations
  • Explore advanced methods for calculating natural abundances using mass spectrometry
  • Investigate the role of isotopes in nuclear chemistry and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals involved in isotopic analysis or those interested in the quantitative aspects of elemental composition.

pzona
Messages
234
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Carbon has two naturally occurring isotopes with the following isotopic masses: 12 (exactly) and 13.003. Calculate the percent natural abundance of carbon-13.


Homework Equations


I'm not sure if this is right, but here's what I used. I set up a system of two equations, 12x+13.003y=12.0107 (12.0107 being the atomic weight for carbon, obtained from the periodic table) and x+y=1 (because these are the ratios, which will be used to find the percentages).


The Attempt at a Solution


I solved for y, since that's the percentage I'm looking for. I don't think I should need to show my work, since it's pretty basic, but I was wondering if this is the right way to go about solving this problem. My answer came out to 1.1%, or 0.011 for y. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Method looks OK and the result seems to be in a correct ballpark.

--
 
Last edited:
Thanks Borek, I appreciate the prompt response.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K