MHB Calculate $\overline{AB}+\overline{AC}$ of Regular Nonagon ABCDEFGHI

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Regular
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$A\,\, regular \,\,nonagon \,\,ABCDEFGHI,\,\,if \,\,\overline{AE}=1$

$find :\overline{AB}+\overline{AC}=?$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My attempt:
View attachment 6451The irregular pentagon $ABCDE$ has a total interior angle sum of $540^{\circ}$. Therefore, $\angle EAB = \angle AED = 60^{\circ}$.

From the figure, we have ($x = \overline{AB}, \: \: \: y=\overline{AC}$):

\[y = \frac{1}{2\cos 40^{\circ}},\: \: \: x = \frac{y}{2\cos 20^{\circ}} = \frac{1}{4\cos 20^{\circ}\cos 40^{\circ}} \\\\ \\\\ x+y = \frac{2\cos 20^{\circ}+1}{4\cos 20^{\circ}\cos 40^{\circ}}=\frac{2\cos 20^{\circ}+1}{2(\cos 20^{\circ}+\cos 60^{\circ})} = 1.\]
 

Attachments

  • Nonagon.PNG
    Nonagon.PNG
    10.9 KB · Views: 106
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top