Calculate Size of Radius for Muonic Atom in Lithium-7

  • Thread starter Thread starter touley
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the size of the radius for a muonic atom in a doubly ionized lithium-7 ion. The key equations used include the Bohr radius formula, specifically modified for lithium with atomic number Z=3, and the reduced mass formula, which incorporates the mass of the muon (106 MeV/c²) and the lithium nucleus (approximately 2814 MeV). Participants identified issues with calculating the reduced mass and its impact on the radius and binding energy calculations. The correct reduced mass is crucial for accurate results in determining the smallest radius and binding energy of the muon in the ground state.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of muonic atoms and their properties
  • Familiarity with the Bohr model of the atom
  • Knowledge of reduced mass calculations
  • Basic grasp of quantum mechanics and atomic physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Bohr radius for multi-electron systems
  • Learn about the concept of reduced mass in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the binding energy calculations for muonic atoms
  • Investigate the properties of lithium-7 and its isotopes
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in atomic physics, particularly those focusing on muonic atoms, quantum mechanics, and binding energy calculations. This discussion is especially beneficial for those tackling similar problems in advanced physics courses or research projects.

touley
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
size of radius -- HELP

Hi

I'm stuck on a problem that I've been working on for a very long time and I was hoping someone could help. The problem reads as follows:

A muonic atom consists of a muon (m = 106 MeV/c2) in place of an electron. For the muon in a doubly ionized lithium-7 ion, calculate the following quantities.
a) the smallest radius in the ground state
(b) the binding energy of the muon in the ground state
(c) the series limit of the wavelength for the first three series
nm (first series)
nm (second series)
nm (third series)

I know I need to use the equation:

4*pi*epsilon*h-bar^{2} / me^{2}

Because the atom is lithium, I know I have to include Z (Z=3) next to the e^{2}. I derived the formula a billion times - I don't know what I'm doing wrong!
I also know that I need to find the reduced mass of a muon in lithium. I think I did this right.

I've been trying to work this out for an obscene amount of time. I feel like I'm overlooking something very basic. Can anyone help me please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, that's the Bohr radius. And yes, you should change one of the e's to Ze and use the reduced mass. So what makes you think you are doing something wrong?
 
its online homework. every time i put my answer in, its wrong. i don't have very many chances left.

maybe I'm calculating the reduced mass wrong?

the equation is: m*M/(m+M)

for m I'm using the mass of the muon, 106MeV.
for M I'm using the mass of the nucleus, which is 3 times the mass of a proton, because I'm dealing with lithium. Mass of a proton is 938 Mev. 3 times that is 2814 Mev. I also tried it with kg-masses and I still get a wrong answer.
It's been PAST TIME for me to move on, but I need this one to figure out the rest. :bugeye:
 
lol, i also tried it using the reduced mass of one muon and one proton. i still don't get the right answer.
 
Three protons is not a stable lithium nucleus. The most common isotope has mass 7.
 
still not getting it right.

reduced mass of muon = m * 7M / (m + 7M) ?
 
Using mass of Li from a periodic table of 6.941 amu (I don't have a list of isotope masses). I get 1.85*10^(-28) kg for the reduced mass. Just a couple percent below the muon mass.
 
Thank You! You're The Best! :)
 
touley said:
Thank You! You're The Best! :)

So what were you doing wrong?
 
  • #10
i kept getting 1.82 * 10^-28 for my reduced mass and it gave me a slightly larger radius. i guess it wasn't close enough for 'em. thanks again :-D
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K