Calculate superconductor's magnetic susceptibility from Inductance

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic susceptibility (X) of a yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO) superconductor using inductance measurements. The inductance (L) is derived from voltage (V) and resistance (R) using the equation L = sqrt((V/I)² + R²). To find susceptibility, the inductance in a vacuum (L0) is required, which can be estimated from high-temperature readings where X is assumed to be 0. The area shielding ratio (α) can be determined from low-temperature readings where X approaches -1. This method provides a systematic approach to derive susceptibility from inductance data.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inductance calculations using voltage and resistance
  • Familiarity with magnetic susceptibility and its relation to inductance
  • Basic knowledge of superconductivity and YBCO properties
  • Ability to perform temperature measurements and data analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to measure inductance accurately in superconductors
  • Learn about the properties of YBCO and its critical temperature (Tc)
  • Study the relationship between magnetic permeability and susceptibility
  • Explore advanced electromagnetic theory to deepen understanding of magnetic properties
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and students studying superconductivity who are interested in calculating magnetic properties from experimental data.

J.Sterling47
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I have some data taken on voltage and resistance of a coil part of a yttrium barium copper oxicde (ycbo) superconductor. I have no information about the coil itself. A thermocouple attached to the superconductor also measured the temperature of it as it was cooled. This data was used to calculate the inductance of the coil as a function of temperature. I need to convert this somehow to susceptibility as a function of temperature, but since I lack other data such inductance of the coil in a vacuum, I do not know if there is a direct way to do this.

Homework Equations


L is inductance, V is voltage across the coil, and R is the resistance.

L = sqrt( (V/I)2 + R2)

The Attempt at a Solution



If the inductance of the coil in a vacuum L0 could be determined (probably use online value if I can find it) then magnetic susceptibility X is

X = (L / L0 - 1)/α

Where α is the fraction of the coil occupied by the sample. This value I don't know but assuming I could find L_0 could I just approximate it to 1?

There is a similar equation using magnetic permeability

µ = µ0(1 + X)

but once again I do not have µ.

Another attempt was taking the derivative of my graph of inductance over temperature, and it gave a plot closer to the real plot of magnetization vs temperature, but I have not taken advanced E&M classes and do not know how to justify this.

So is there anyway to directly get X without knowing other things besides I, L, R and V? Or do I use these to find other quantities which I then use to get X?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to tackle the problem by considering the fraction of the area of the coil that is shielded by the superconductor - that is use your "X = (L/L0 - 1)/α" equation. I don't think you can get away without knowing this even if you wanted to try the permeability approach (which looks more difficult).

You will need to find the inductance of the coil with none of its area shielded L0, and you will either need to know (a) what fraction of its area the superconductor sample covers, or you will need to (b) assume that at a low enough temperature the susceptibility of the sample approaches -1 (complete blocking). In which case you can calculate what fraction of the area of the coil it covers from the ratio of the low temperature inductance at low temperature to the inductance at high temperature (or with the sample removed).

You can know the inductance of the coil from your measurement using your first equation L = sqrt( (V/I)2 + R2). You simply have to measure V and I in a situation where you know that the YCBO sample is not affecting the measurement - ie either removed completely or at such a high temperature (relative to its Tc) that it is just a piece of ordinary ceramic. This gives you L0.

So the simplest approach is to use your highest temperature readings to give L0 (by assuming X=0 at that temperature). Then determine the area shielding ratio α from your lowest temperature reading (by assuming X=-1 at that temperature). Then plot all your other points using these constants. You should obviously get an interesting curve for X which starts from 0 at high temperature and ends at -1 at low temperature.

Good Luck!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K