Calculate Tension of Wire with 6kg Mass on 3.5m Rod

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chica1975
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tension Wire
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the tension in a wire supporting a horizontal rod with a mass attached at one end. The rod is pivoted at one end, and the wire is attached at a point along the rod. The subject area includes concepts of forces, torques, and trigonometry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use trigonometric relationships and free body diagrams to analyze the forces and angles involved. Some participants question the calculations and suggest focusing on torque rather than just forces.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different approaches to set up the problem, with one suggesting a focus on torques and the importance of labeling forces in a free body diagram. There is no explicit consensus on the method, but guidance has been offered regarding the use of torques.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the problem ignoring the mass of the rod, and the original poster expresses difficulty in arriving at a correct answer, indicating potential confusion in the setup or calculations.

Chica1975
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
A light rod of length 3.5m was pivoted at one end and was horizontal. On the end away from the pivot was a mass of 6kg. In addition to the pivot, a vertical wire supported the rod. The wire was attached at a point 1.16m from the pivoted end. Calculate the tension in the wire



Homework Equations


Force by gravity = mg
tan-1 = (opp/adj)
costheta = adj/hyp
sintheta = opp/hyp

The Attempt at a Solution



I drew a diagram relating to all the info given above. I have attempted to find the angle using mg and 3.5m i get something ridiculous like 1 degree. I know there are 180 degrees in a triangle and tried to find the other angle and follow this pattern using trigonometry until I was able to find the tension of the wire. My answer was way off.

apparently the correct answer is 177.

Thanks a mil.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you create an image of the free body diagram you used? What are the actual calculations you did?
 
Unfortunately, I am traveling and do not have a scanner at all. However, I drew as best I could I also calculated mg = 58.8

I even tried to draw a right angled triangle using mg as one of the sides, this did not work.

The forces working on this are vertical (the wire), mg (gravitational).

Thanks
 
Okay, I'll try and work you through the first bit of setting this problem up. From the looks if this the problem ignores the mass of the arm.

The thing with this problem is that it's not your straight up force problem, it requires you deal with torques. Never fear though, because they're incredibly simple to work with at this level. Just in case you've forgotten, all you need to calculate a torque is the force, and the distance from the pivot. So your torque is applied like this: Torque=(force in Newtons)(distance in metres), with your units being Newton metres (N*m).

Now as always with a free body diagram label all the forces acting on the object. I'm going to try and approximate the drawing here:

(pivot)====(support)=========(weight)

I'm going to define up, right, and counter-clockwise as positive. Imagine the support arrow going up, and the weight arrow going down.
Now when dealing with torques, a handy technique for eliminating unknowns is placing your pivot point on those unknowns. In this case you're given the pivot point, and the distances of each force applied from that pivot. So you don't need to worry about that.

Now use your standard net force equation, since the arm is stationary you have no net force. Therefore your torque forces must cancel out:
(the standard symbol for torques is a lowercase Tau)
F_{net}=0=\tau_{support}+\tau_{weight}

Try and move on from there.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K