Calculate the direction and magnitude problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three charges arranged in a specific configuration, with given magnitudes for each charge. The original poster seeks to calculate the direction and magnitude of the force acting on one of the charges, specifically q1, due to the other two charges, q2 and q3.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of Coulomb's law to calculate the forces between the charges and express confusion regarding the correct application of formulas. There are attempts to clarify the distinction between force and charge, as well as the need to consider angles and components in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the calculation of forces, suggesting the use of vector components and the importance of accurately determining distances between charges. There is ongoing clarification regarding the correct configuration of the charges and the distances involved, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There is confusion regarding the distances between the charges, which affects the calculations. The original poster has acknowledged mistakes in their earlier assumptions about the configuration of the charges.

Cudi1
Messages
98
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


3 charges are arranged in the diagram below. their magnitudes are:
q1=2.5*10^-17C
q2=3.0*10^-17C
q3= 3.5*10^-17

calculate the direction and magnitude of q1

Homework Equations


F=kq^2/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution


well, i used f=kq^2/r^2, the charge of q3= (9*10^9)(3.5*10^-17)^2/(0.5)^2= 1.2*10^-17
q2=(9*10^9)(3*10^-17)^2/(0.50)^2= 3.24*10^-17N
im unable to find the angle of q1, how would i solve it really confused, i know you can use cos law but angle unknown, thank you
 

Attachments

  • picture..png
    picture..png
    7.2 KB · Views: 485
Physics news on Phys.org


btw , the angle from q3 to q1 is 90 deg
 


Cudi1 said:
calculate the direction and magnitude of q1
I'll assume you mean the direction and magnitude of the force on q1 :smile:
F=kq^2/r^2
That equation is wrong. Instead, use
F = k qa qb / r2
for the force between two charges qa and qb
 


sorry, i just minimized the formula since it was late, i know I am suppose to use
F=q1q2/r^2 ( but how do i do this, I am really confused) this question , could it be resolved in components ?
 


After you calculate F=kq1q2/r^2, and think about what direction that force is acting, then yes you resolve it into components.
 


so do i calculate the charge from q1-q3, and q1-q2 :S, sorry the question is really bothering me
 


You calculate the force from q3 on q1, and the force from q2 on q1.

You don't have to calculate any charge, the charge values are provided in the problem statement. The problem is to calculate force, not charge. They are two different things. Force is not charge. Force is not charge. Force is not charge. Force is not charge.
 


ok i think i got it, but how would you draw a diagram if the one charge was attractive, in this case all the charges are repulsive
 


You're calculating the force not the charge. The force q1-q3 is:

F = k_e \frac{q_1 q_3}{r^2}

The force q1-q2 similarly.

F = k_e \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}

You can find the angle in q1 corner using the tangent function. Now sum them like vectors and you're done.
 
  • #10


thank you very much for the help, I'm able to get it
 
  • #11


okay , so using the pythagorean theorem, since hypotenuse is known it would be
b^2=a^2-c^2 ( then I am done) :) , if that's all i thank you all for the help
 
  • #12


I don't really understand that last post, but if you show your work we can help tell you if it's right or wrong.
 
  • #13


okay, the charge of 1 to charge 3 is (9*10^9)(3.5*10^-17)(2.5*10^-17)/(0.3)^2
= 8.75*10^-23N
then, charge 1 to 2 is (9*10^9)(3*10^-17)(2.5*10^-17)/(0.5)^2 = 2.7*10^-23
after i have these 2 charges i have to do pythogorean theroem but for the unknown side I am getting a negative root ans
 
  • #14


Okay, we are starting to get somewhere now. But something is rather confusing. In the drawings you show in Post #1, the distance between charges 1 and 3 is not 0.3m. The distance between charges 1 and 2 is not 0.5m. But these are the distances you used in the calculations of the forces.

Question: which of the two figures you showed earlier is the correct configuration of the charges?

Finally, if I may politely ask you ... please stop using the word "charge" when you really mean (or should mean) "force". It indicates that you are not really paying attention to what you are doing or what we are saying.
 
  • #15


ok , sorry about that, but I am getting it a little more the correct configuration is the one to the left. the reason i drew the one to the right is to show the repulsive forces that q1 experiences.
 
  • #16


Okay, thanks for clearing that up. You'll need to recalculate the forces using the correct distances between the charges.
 
  • #17


no problem, i thought i already calculated the force b/w q1 and q2, likewise i calculated the force between q1 & q3 ,would'nt i need to draw a diagram showing the repulsive forces on q1( the picture to the right) ?
 
  • #18


Cudi1 said:
no problem, i thought i already calculated the force b/w q1 and q2, likewise i calculated the force between q1 & q3 ,...
Reread my post #14, especially the part about the distances between the charges.
would'nt i need to draw a diagram showing the repulsive forces on q1( the picture to the right) ?
I thought the picture to the right was incorrect? The pictures can't both be correct, since they show the charges in different arrangements.

I have to say, you do need to be careful and pay more attention, otherwise there is no way I can help you out.
 
  • #19


OH MAN, thank i completely messed up the distances
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K