What is the magnitude & direction of the eletric field?

  • #1

Homework Statement


Two +3.0nC charges are shown in the diagram below which are spaced 10cm apart. What are the strength and direction of the electric field at the position indicated by the dot in the figure (Figure 1) ?

What is the electric field in N/C?
What is the direction of the electric field? (above the horizontal)

Homework Equations


E = kq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



For the top charge:
E1 = (8.99*10^9)(3*10^-9C)/(.05m)^2 = 10788 N/C
E2 = (8.99*10^9)(3*10-9C)/(.1118m)^2 = 2157.7 N/C

Add them together and I got 1.3 * 10 ^4 N/C

My answer was wrong... was it because the two charge have the same signed charge so really the y-components cancel so the magnitude of the electric field is just 2*E1?
 

Attachments

Answers and Replies

  • #2
gneill
Mentor
20,840
2,814
The electric field is a vector quantity. You need to be adding vectors, not magnitudes.
 
  • Like
Likes sunnnystrong
  • #3
Doc Al
Mentor
44,987
1,259
Add them together and I got 1.3 * 10 ^4 N/C
The field contribution from each charge is a vector. You must add them as vectors, not just numbers. Direction counts!
 
  • Like
Likes sunnnystrong
  • #4
Oh, okay so for the E1 (Top charge):

E1 = ((8.99*10^9)(3*10-9)/(.05^2) i, 0j)

E2 (Bottom charge):
E2 = ((8.99*10^9)(3*10-9)/(.05^2) i, (8.99*10^9)(3*10-9)/(.1^2) j)

Etotal = (21576 i, 2697j)

|Etotal| = 21743.909 N/C ? I already tried this and they said it was wrong
 
  • #5
The electric field is a vector quantity. You need to be adding vectors, not magnitudes.
The field contribution from each charge is a vector. You must add them as vectors, not just numbers. Direction counts!
^^ see reply. I am a little confused about the directions.
 
  • #6
gneill
Mentor
20,840
2,814
E2 (Bottom charge):
E2 = ((8.99*10^9)(3*10-9)/(.05^2) i, (8.99*10^9)(3*10-9)/(.1^2) j)
This calculation is not correct. You can't take the components of the distance vector and use them individually as distances for the calculation of the field components. You need to use the scalar distance between the charge and the location of interest in the Coulomb equation when finding the magnitude of the field, then break that magnitude into x and y components according to the vector direction. The radial distances are ##r_1## and ##r_2## in the figure below:

upload_2017-4-16_17-49-35.png
 
  • Like
Likes sunnnystrong
  • #7
This calculation is not correct. You can't take the components of the distance vector and use them individually as distances for the calculation of the field components. You need to use the scalar distance between the charge and the location of interest in the Coulomb equation when finding the magnitude of the field, then break that magnitude into x and y components according to the vector direction. The radial distances are ##r_1## and ##r_2## in the figure below:

View attachment 195077
Okay so I am a little confused but for Q1 the electric field would be:
10788 N/C...

for Q2 it would be 2157.73 N/C...

The components of Q1 would be (10788i, 0j) & for Q2 it would be (2157.7cos(60) i, 2157.7sin(60) j) ?
 
  • #8
This calculation is not correct. You can't take the components of the distance vector and use them individually as distances for the calculation of the field components. You need to use the scalar distance between the charge and the location of interest in the Coulomb equation when finding the magnitude of the field, then break that magnitude into x and y components according to the vector direction. The radial distances are ##r_1## and ##r_2## in the figure below:

View attachment 195077
& The magnitude of the field would be 1.2*10^4 N/C & the direction would be 8.95 degrees above the horizontal?
 
  • #9
gneill
Mentor
20,840
2,814
Okay so I am a little confused but for Q1 the electric field would be:
10788 N/C...

for Q2 it would be 2157.73 N/C...

The components of Q1 would be (10788i, 0j) & for Q2 it would be (2157.7cos(60) i, 2157.7sin(60) j) ?
Close, but is the angle really exactly 60 degrees? How did you determine the angle?

Note that when you have similar triangles (in the geometric sense of "similar"), it's often easier to just work with the ratios of known side lengths to form the trig functions. So, for example, the cosine of your angle might be formed as:

##cos(θ) = \frac{5}{\sqrt{5^2 + 10^2}}##
 
  • Like
Likes sunnnystrong
  • #10
Close, but is the angle really exactly 60 degrees? How did you determine the angle?

Note that when you have similar triangles (in the geometric sense of "similar"), it's often easier to just work with the ratios of known side lengths to form the trig functions. So, for example, the cosine of your angle might be formed as:

##cos(θ) = \frac{5}{\sqrt{5^2 + 10^2}}##
ohhh! thank you so much!

the direction of the field will be 9.32 degrees above the horizontal
 
  • #11
gneill
Mentor
20,840
2,814
the direction of the field will be 9.32 degrees above the horizontal
Yes! :approve:
 
  • Like
Likes sunnnystrong

Related Threads on What is the magnitude & direction of the eletric field?

Replies
2
Views
492
Replies
23
Views
810
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
528
Top