Calculate the energy of the electron in a non-H like atom

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The energy of an electron in a non-hydrogen-like atom, particularly in Rydberg states, cannot be determined exactly due to the complexity of multi-electron interactions. Numerical or approximate methods are essential for calculations, as classical solutions do not apply. The concept of screening by other electrons allows for simplifications, where an electron at a greater distance from the nucleus can be treated as experiencing a point charge of +1e. Perturbation theory and quantum defect calculations are critical for estimating the effects of the nucleus's finite size on electron energy levels.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Rydberg atoms and their energy levels
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics and perturbation theory
  • Knowledge of electron screening effects in multi-electron systems
  • Basic principles of quantum chemistry, particularly regarding atomic structure
NEXT STEPS
  • Research numerical methods for calculating electron energies in multi-electron atoms
  • Study quantum defect theory and its applications in atomic physics
  • Explore perturbation theory in quantum mechanics for approximating energy levels
  • Investigate the effects of electron screening in complex atomic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in atomic physics, quantum chemistry, and anyone interested in the behavior of electrons in non-hydrogen-like atoms.

jorgeha
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Hello mates. I was doing some research about Rydberg atoms, and I came up with this question: what's the energy of an electron in n energy level in an atom which is NOT hydrogen-like, that is, an atom with more than 1 electron? How can we calculate it?
What if the electron we are studying is in a much higher energy level (Rydberg energy level) and the others are in the lowest posible? What if we have an excited electron apart of the one we are studying?

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jorgeha said:
How can we calculate it?

Numerically or approximately. It does not have an exact solution. Note that you have 3 or more bodies here, and that doesn't even have a classical solution.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Numerically or approximately. It does not have an exact solution. Note that you have 3 or more bodies here, and that doesn't even have a classical solution.
I was asking for a numerical calculation. I guessed it could only be an approximate answer but I didn't know to what extent. I'd like the most exact approach possible, if you could lead me to some articles or books about these calculations I would be grateful. Thanks.
 
If one of the electrons has a position distribution where it's at a much longer average distance from the nucleus than the others, I think it will effectively see the nucleus as a point charge of +1e because of the screening by the other electrons. Another way to obtain the same effect is to make a "helium atom" where one of the orbiting particles is an electron and the other a muon (the muon will have a much smaller "orbit radius" because of its large mass compared to the electron).
 
hilbert2 said:
If one of the electrons has a position distribution where it's at a much longer average distance from the nucleus than the others, I think it will effectively see the nucleus as a point charge of +1e because of the screening by the other electrons. Another way to obtain the same effect is to make a "helium atom" where one of the orbiting particles is an electron and the other a muon (the muon will have a much smaller "orbit radius" because of its large mass compared to the electron).
Yes, the core is taken into account then via some "quantum defect": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_defect
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hilbert2
I remember some perturbation calculations in a quantum chemistry homework where we had to estimate the effect of the finite size of the nucleus by assuming that the nucleus is a small sphere that contains a constant positive charge density. Then the potential inside the nucleus was calculated with Gauss's law. A core that contains both positive and negative charge is probably not very different.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K