Calculate the orbital radius of a synchronous satellite

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the orbital radius of a synchronous satellite, specifically one that has a period of 24 hours, allowing it to appear stationary above a point on Earth. Participants also explore the relationship between this orbital radius and the Earth's radius, as well as the necessity for the satellite to be in the plane of the Equator. Additionally, there is a secondary question regarding the angle a receiving aerial must point at a latitude of 45 degrees to receive signals from the satellite.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use the equation for centripetal acceleration to find the orbital radius but expresses confusion over the results. Other participants discuss gravitational acceleration and its relationship to orbital mechanics, questioning how to apply relevant equations. There is also mention of external resources, such as Wikipedia, to aid understanding.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their thoughts and attempting to clarify concepts related to geosynchronous satellites. Some guidance has been offered regarding gravitational equations, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or solution yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the topic, with some expressing uncertainty about the application of gravitational equations and the specifics of the problem setup. There is mention of a textbook that may contain relevant information, indicating that the original poster may be working within specific homework constraints.

james111
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'v been trying to work out this question for ages, but nothings quite working for me, here goes..

q. a) calculate the orbital radius of a synchronous satellite (one period of 24hr, so appears stationary above anyone point). Approximately how many radii of Earth is this orbital radius? Why does the satellite have to be in the plane of the Equator?

b) draw a scale diagram to estimate the angle above the horizontal that a receiving aerial in latitude 45 deg must point in order to receive signals from the satellite.

For a) I figured that I could use the eqn a = (v^2)/r for circular motion substituting v = 2rPi / (24x60x60) ... but this gives r as 1853078.528km :rolleyes: I think... which would be wrong. I don't know wot to do. :confused:

thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IIRC, geosynchronous satellites are something like 24,000 miles up (dunno if that's above the Earth's surface or measured from the center of the Earth, though). Because the acceleration due to gravity falls off in space, you need to figure out where the central acceleration due to that lower gravitational acceleration is correct for the orbital velocity. Do you know the equation that gives the gravitational acceleration in terms of two masses m and M and the gravitational constant G and the radius r?
 
Hey, I just checked wikipedia, and I was pretty close with my guess. James, *after* you work out this problem and get an answer close to my guess, check out the page at wikipedia.org about "geosynchronous".
 
GMm/R ?? I still can't figure how we can apply this. Sorry, this is quite a new area for me, and I still haven't fully figured it out.
 
james111 said:
GMm/R ?? I still can't figure how we can apply this. Sorry, this is quite a new area for me, and I still haven't fully figured it out.
Um, no. Close, but not correct. Do you have a textbook for this class? It should definitely be giving you this information before asking you this question.

I went back to the wikipedia page about geosynchronous orbits, and followed a link at the bottom of that page to a web page about orbital mechanics. It's a nice write-up, and it has the correct equation (similar to yours but with one term changed) part-way down the page. Try reading through this link to see if it helps this question make more sense.

http://www.braeunig.us/space/orbmech.htm
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K