Calculating 3D Vector Resultant - Suneyna

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the resultant of two 3D vectors: vec1 = (-0.3960, 4.6660, 15.2610) and vec2 = (-4.1230, -13.2200, 17.9170). The resultant vector is computed as res = (-4.5190, -8.5540, 33.1780), which is derived by summing the corresponding components of the two vectors. A key point of confusion arises regarding the direction of the resultant vector, particularly whether it can point upwards when both original vectors appear to point downwards. The consensus is that the mathematical calculation is correct, but the interpretation of vector direction in 3D space requires further clarification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation in 3D space (ai + bj + ck)
  • Basic knowledge of vector addition
  • Familiarity with MATLAB for graphical representation of vectors
  • Concept of vector direction and orientation in three-dimensional space
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore vector addition in 3D using MATLAB
  • Learn about vector direction and orientation in three-dimensional geometry
  • Study the implications of vector components on resultant direction
  • Investigate graphical tools for visualizing 3D vectors
USEFUL FOR

Students, engineers, and professionals working in fields involving 3D modeling, physics, or computer graphics who need to understand vector calculations and their interpretations in three-dimensional space.

suneyna
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

Please guide me to calculate the resultant of the following two 3D vectors.
vec1 =(-0.3960i,4.6660j,15.2610k)
vec2 =(-4.1230i,-13.2200j,17.9170k)

Thanks
Suneyna
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First a matter of notation- don't use parens and commas and "i", "j", and "k". Either (a, b, c) or ai+ bj+ ck.

The "resultant" or sum of the vectors ai+ bj+ ck and ui+ vj+ wk is just (a+ u)i+ (b+ v)j+ (c+ w)k.
 
Thanks for the response and guiding me about the correct notation.
I calculated the resultant in the same way as you mentioned.
Now I want to ask you that is it possible that two 3d vectors pointing downwards (but both didn't lie in the same plane) can have their resultant in upward direction.
 
suneyna said:
Now I want to ask you that is it possible that two 3d vectors pointing downwards (but both didn't lie in the same plane) can have their resultant in upward direction.

What do you mean by two 3d vectors not lying the the same plane? As far as I know, any two vectors must lie on the same plane (if all vectors point from the origin).
 
I don't know how to paste a figure in the thread to make my point clear. but i am writing my vectors coordinates as follows:

vec1 =(-0.3960,4.6660,15.2610)

vec2 =(-4.1230,-13.2200,17.9170), both originated from origin (0,0,0) and the resultant is: res =(-4.5190,-8.5540,33.1780)

So, am i calculating the resultant in the right way?
I am pretty confused with their (above two vectors and resultant) directions.
 
It's looks like you are doing the math correctly. However, I'm confused as to why you are confused. I don't see any vector that points downward.
 
Dear I am working on a structure in MATLAB and drawn a vector 1, which originates from origin(0,0,0) and pointing towards one end of the structure and hence calculate vec1 from the coordinate information of the structure itself as vec1 =(-0.3960,4.6660,15.2610). Now, If u draw it in MATLAb or on some graphical tool, you will get the direction as i said.
Similarlily, I calculated vector 2 as vec2 =(-4.1230,-13.2200,17.9170), I know it is also, originated from origin so from the magnitude itself you can draw this vector too.

Now, I am thinking that the resultant vector res =(-4.5190,-8.5540,33.1780) should lie in between these two vectors, originating from origin and should points downwards as seen in above two (but not sure).

I am confused as this seems to be correct in 2d but for 3d i m not sure.
So I want your suggestion to be sure that i am working in right direction or not?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K