Calculating acceleration due to friction without mass?

Click For Summary
To calculate the acceleration of a car due to friction without knowing its mass, it's essential to recognize that mass cancels out in the equations of motion. The problem involves a car braking with a coefficient of friction of 0.719 and gravity at 9.8 m/s². The initial confusion stemmed from the assumption that mass was necessary for the calculation. Once clarified, the acceleration can be determined using the formula a = μg, where μ is the coefficient of friction. Understanding this principle allows for the correct calculation of acceleration due to friction.
Amber_
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Here is the problem:
You are driving at the speed of 28.4 m/s
(63.5426 mph) when suddenly the car in
front of you (previously traveling at the same
speed) brakes. Considering an average human
reaction, you press your brakes 0.505 s later.
Assume that the brakes on both cars are fully
engaged and that the coefficient of friction is
0.719 between both cars and the road.
The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s 2

Calculate the acceleration of the car in front
of you when it brakes.
Answer in units of m/s 2

Note: this is the first part of a multipart question.

2. The attempt at a solution

I know exactly how I would do this problem, were the masses of the cars given. I honestly have no idea how you would get the acceleration due to friction without knowing the mass of the car. Is it possible that this is a mistake in the problem, or am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amber_ said:
I know exactly how I would do this problem, were the masses of the cars given.

Ok, I give you the mass. It is equal to m.
 
I thought of that, but . . . oh. Oops.

Clearly I didn't think hard enough before because I didn't realize the m's should cancel out. Okay I get it now! Thanks for that.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
903
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
22K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K