Calculating Acceleration in a Pulley System with Inclined Boxes

  • Thread starter Thread starter zaga04
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of a pulley system involving two boxes of equal mass, positioned on inclined planes at different angles. The participants explore the effects of both frictionless conditions and the presence of kinetic friction on the system's acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to analyze the forces acting on each box using free-body diagrams and equations of motion, but expresses confusion regarding the role of an external applied force. Other participants question the necessity of this force, suggesting that gravity alone can initiate the motion.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shifted their approach by considering the system without an external force, leading to new equations for the acceleration of the boxes. There is ongoing exploration of the effects of friction in the second part of the problem, with calculations being presented but lacking consensus on their correctness.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about the forces involved, particularly the role of the applied force and the treatment of friction in the calculations. The original poster's initial approach included an external force that was later questioned by others.

zaga04
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


They're two boxes connected on a pulley, each weighing 2 kg. Box 1 is on a 30 degree incline and box 2 is on a 60 degree incline.
a. Find the acceleration ignoring friction
b. Find the acceleration if the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.1.

Homework Equations


F=ma
Ffr=ukFN

The Attempt at a Solution


I drew the free-body diagram. We are missing the pulling of pushing force (Fp), the tension force and the acceleration (which we are trying to find).

So this what I did for part a (ignoring friction):
BOX 1-
- ∑Fx1=Fp+mgsinΘ-FT=m1a1
- Ft=Fp + mgsinΘ - m1a1

I solved for tension force since we don't have that.

BOX 2-
- ∑Fx2=Fp-mgsinΘ+FT=m2a2
I substituted the equation from Box 1 for Ft so I could eliminate it.
- Fp+Fp+mgsinΘ-mgsinΘ - m1a1=m2a2
- 2Fp/m1m2=a

So I am left with Fp still, which we don't know. I am confused.

For part b, with coefficient of kinetic friction of .1, I did the same thing but I added Ffr for box #2 because I made it so that the pulling force and the tension force were in the same direction while the frictional force would obviously be opposing that. For box #1 I thought that Ft would be like the frictional force since it's opposing force (I made the box going down in #1) so I didn't even add it for that part.

Can you tell me what I am doing wrong.
physicspicture.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no external applied force (Fp) unless it is explicitly stated that there is. You seem to be under the impression that somebody needs to "do something" to get this system moving. Gravity is perfectly capable of doing that just fine. The system is exactly as described, nothing more, nothing less.
 
Alright, I'll go see if I can solve it without having an applied force.
 
So ignoring Fp would it go something like this...

Box 1:
Ft-mgsin30=m1a1
Ft=m1a1 + mgsin30

Box 2:
Ft-mgsin60=m2a2
m1a1+mgsin30-mgsin60 = m2a2
mgsin30-mgsin60/m1+m2 = a
a= -1.8 m/s^2

-------------------------
b.
Box 1
Ft-mgsin30-ukFn=ma
Ft=ma + mgsin30+ukFn
*Fn=mgcos30=16.97*

Box 2
Ft-mgsin60-ukFn=ma
m1a1 + mgsin30 - uk1Fn1 - mgsin60 - uk2Fn2 = m2a2
mgsin30 - uk1Fn1 - mgsin60 - uk2Fn2/m1+m2 = a
9.8 - (.1)(16.97) - 16.97 - (9.8) (.1)/4 = a
a = -1.61 m/s^2

correct?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
Replies
48
Views
8K