Calculating Acceleration of Block on Inclined Plane with Applied Force

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a block sliding down an inclined plane with an applied force. The block has a mass of 10 kg, an incline angle of 37 degrees, and a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.500. The equations of motion are established as Σx = mgsin(θ) - fk = ma and Σy = (20N + mgcos(θ)) - n = 0. The participants confirm that the mass in the denominator does not drop out due to the nature of the applied force being independent of mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law (F = ma)
  • Knowledge of inclined plane physics
  • Familiarity with forces including normal force and friction
  • Basic trigonometry involving sine and cosine functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of varying the angle of incline on acceleration
  • Explore the role of friction in inclined plane problems
  • Learn about the implications of applied forces in dynamics
  • Investigate the relationship between mass and acceleration in different force scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding dynamics and forces on inclined planes.

siderealtime
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A block slides down an inclined plane, here are the variables:

theta of incline = 37 degrees
mass of block = 10 kg
coefficient of kinetic friction = .500
applied force on block perpendicular to plane = 20N

\sum x = mgsin(theta) - fk = ma

\sum y = (20N + mgcos(theta)) - n = 0


n = 20N + mgcos(theta) = 98.3N
fk = \mu*n

I need to find acceleration of the block. Here is how I'm currently doing
it and I would like to know if this is correct.

solving for a in the first equation gives
a = mgsin(theta) - \muk*n / m

What I'm wondering is if the mass in the denominator is supposed to drop out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi siderealtime! welcome to pf! :smile:

(have a mu: µ and a theta: θ and a sigma: ∑ and a degree: ° :wink:)

yes, that looks fine :smile:

(and the m won't drop out, because the 20N in this case isn't proportional to m)
 
Your normal force will certainly depend on mass, so it should cancel out.
 
Ugh, which is it, these both seem to make sense. Would anyone care to elaborate on how the division by m would go away or not?
 
hi siderealtime! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)

xerxes is thinking of the usual normal force, which is proportional to m

but this 20N is an applied force, perhaps from something like a jet, whose value does not depend on m

(it would be different if say there was a 20N weight on top of the mass, which would contribute to the RHS of F = ma, but even then of course the weight would be vertical and not normal, so the proportions still wouldn't be preserved)

making m very large, for example, would make the 20N insignificant by comparison, and would considerably alter the acceleration :wink:
 
Thank you very much, Tim.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K