Calculating Acceleration on a Slope with Friction Coefficients

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fusilli_Jerry89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Slope
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of a brick and a sled on a slope with friction. The problem involves forces acting on both objects, including tension, gravity, and friction coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants present different methods for calculating acceleration, questioning the assumptions made about the masses and forces involved. Some participants explore the impact of the brick's weight on the sled's acceleration and the forces acting on each object.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with participants discussing the validity of different approaches and calculations. Some guidance is offered regarding the separation of forces acting on the brick and sled, and there is an ongoing examination of the teacher's method versus the original poster's calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of using symbols in calculations and the need for free body diagrams to clarify the forces acting on each object. There is also mention of potential errors in numerical values provided by the teacher.

Fusilli_Jerry89
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
a 2.0 kg brick rides on a 20kg sled and is dragged upa22 degree slope by a rope witha tension of 1000 N. Theropeis parallel totheslope. The friction coefficient(both static and kinetic) between the brick and sled is 0.30 and between the sled and the ground is 0.15. Predict each mass's acceleration. I got 0.8 m/s/s for thebrick which I'm sure is right, and for the sled sled I got 40 m/s but the teacher says it is 45 m/s/s.

Teacher's method:
1000-20(9.8)sin22-0.15(22)(9.8)sin22-5.4=20a
a=45.5m/s/s

My method:
1000-81-30-5.4=22a
a=40m/s/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
Teacher's method:
1000-20(9.8)sin22-0.15(22)(9.8)sin22-5.4=20a
a=45.5m/s/s

My method:
1000-81-30-5.4=22a
a=40m/s/s
Since you realize that the brick and sled do not accelerate together, why do you use the total mass in your equation?

(FYI: Getting useful help will be easier if you post your work using symbols, not just numbers.)
 
well doesn't the brick on top add to the force of gravity, which in turn would increase the force of friction and the other force which directs down the slope?
 
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
well doesn't the brick on top add to the force of gravity, which in turn would increase the force of friction and the other force which directs down the slope?
You need to look at the sled and the brick separately and consider all the forces acting on each object. Draw a free body diagram for each of them. Correct the things highlighted by Doc Al

In your last equation, the mass that multiplies a is just the mass of the sled, not the mass of sled plus brick. In your "81" you have included a force that is acting only on the brick as if it were acting on the sled.

The teacher's method is correct, but the numerical value seems a bit off.

I'd like to see how you calculated the 0.8m/s^2 acceleration of the brick. It would be interesting to calculate the total force acting on the brick if the sled were not moving.
 
Last edited:
For the brick: 0.30(19.6)cos22-19.6sin22=2a
 
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
For the brick: 0.30(19.6)cos22-19.6sin22=2a
Looks good. How did you get 0.8 m/s^2 from that?
 
where does the 5.4 come from?
 
gunblaze said:
where does the 5.4 come from?
from 0.30(19.6)cos22 which is friction
 
shouldn't it be this for the sled:

1000-20(9.8)sin22-0.15(22)(9.8)cos22-5.4=20a
a=52.6m/s/s?
So the teacher is wrong?
 
  • #10
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
shouldn't it be this for the sled:

1000-20(9.8)sin22-0.15(22)(9.8)cos22-5.4=20a
This looks right.
a=52.6m/s/s?
Check your arithmetic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K