Calculating activity of a radionuclide

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrew1949
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Activity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the activity of a radionuclide, specifically examining different formulas and their implications. Participants explore the relationship between half-life, decay rates, and activity, delving into both theoretical and mathematical aspects of the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the formula for activity as A = NA x ln(2) / t1/2 and questions why A = 0.5 x NA / t1/2 is not used, suggesting a misunderstanding of the implications of half-life.
  • Another participant explains the decay of atoms using the equation N = N_0 e^{-\lambda t} and derives the activity formula A = λN, linking it to half-life through t_{1/2} = log(2)/λ.
  • A third participant clarifies that A = 0.5 x NA / t1/2 represents mean activity over the half-life, while A = NA x ln(2) / t1/2 represents instantaneous activity, highlighting the difference in context.
  • A later reply confirms the correctness of the third participant's explanation, indicating agreement on the distinction made.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the distinction between mean activity and instantaneous activity as described, but there is no consensus on the initial question regarding the use of the alternative formula A = 0.5 x NA / t1/2.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the implications of using different definitions of activity and their respective contexts, leaving some assumptions about the nature of decay and activity calculations unaddressed.

Andrew1949
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Activity (in Bq) of 1 mol of a radionuclide is given by formula:
A = NA x ln(2) / t1/2 = 0.693 x NA / t1/2
where NA is Avogadro number and t1/2 the half-life (in seconds)

Why don't we use simply A = 0.5 x NA / t1/2 ?

After all, t1/2 means that, after that time, half of atoms will have decayed...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I have N0 atoms in the sample, with a decay rate of λ, the number of atoms in the sample will decay as follows:
N = N_0 e^{-\lambda t}
The activity is the number of decays per second, which is given by:
A = -\frac{dN}{dt} = \lambda N_0 e^{-\lambda t} = \lambda N
The half-life is the time when 1/2 of the atoms have decayed, which from the first equation is given by:
\frac{N}{N_0} = 1/2 = e^{-\lambda t_{1/2}} ;\,\,\, t_{1/2} = \frac{\log(2)}{\lambda}
So the activity is given by A = \frac{\log(2)}{t_{1/2}}N. If we used "1/e-life" instead of "half-life", we wouldn't have this complication.
 
So, calculating A = 0.5 x NA / t1/2 would give us the mean activity from t = 0 (present time) up to t = t1/2 ..., because during the length time t1/2, exactly 0.5 x NA atoms decay.

But calculating A = NA x ln(2) / t1/2 will give the instant activity, when the number of atoms involved is the present number NA.

In that case, OK, I understand the difference.
 
Yes, what you said is correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K