MHB Calculating Amount Financed with Dealer Fee and Down Payment

  • Thread starter Thread starter cici190
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the amount financed including a dealer fee of 7.75% and a down payment of $4,000, the total purchase price is $7,794.43. The dealer fee is part of the down payment, which complicates the financing calculation. By using the formula A = (T - D) / (1 - p), where A is the amount financed, T is the total cost, D is the down payment, and p is the dealer fee percentage, the amount financed is approximately $4,113.20. This calculation ensures that the dealer fee is included in the down payment. The solution effectively addresses the customer's financing needs.
cici190
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Alright so here is my problem. I have a customer who is wanting to finance something at my work. There is a dealer fee of 7.75% of the amount financed and the customer wants to put a down payment of 4000.That 4000 needs to include the dealer fee. The issue is that once the down payment is reduced the amount of the dealer fee goes up because the amount financed goes up. The total amount of what they are purchasing is $7794.43. Am I making any sense? Please help me!

Casey
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let's let $T$ be the total cost, $D$ be the down payment, $A$ be the amount financed and $F$ be the dealer fee, which is to be included in the down payment.

Now, let's split the down payment into two portions, the dealer fee and the remainder $R$ which will reduce the amount financed:

$$D=F+R$$

Now, the dealer fee is a portion $0\le p\le1$ of $A$, so we have:

$$D=pA+R$$

We also find:

$$A=T-R\implies A=T-(D-pA)$$

Thus, we find:

$$A=\frac{T-D}{1-p}$$

Plugging in the data you gave, we find the amount financed is:

$$A=\frac{7794.43-4000}{1-0.0775}\approx4113.20$$
 
MarkFL said:
Let's let $T$ be the total cost, $D$ be the down payment, $A$ be the amount financed and $F$ be the dealer fee, which is to be included in the down payment.

Now, let's split the down payment into two portions, the dealer fee and the remainder $R$ which will reduce the amount financed:

$$D=F+R$$

Now, the dealer fee is a portion $0\le p\le1$ of $A$, so we have:

$$D=pA+R$$

We also find:

$$A=T-R\implies A=T-(D-pA)$$

Thus, we find:

$$A=\frac{T-D}{1-p}$$

Plugging in the data you gave, we find the amount financed is:

$$A=\frac{7794.43-4000}{1-0.0775}\approx4113.20$$

Thank you so much. This is exactly what I needed!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
44
Views
9K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top