Calculating Angle & Speed to Reach Planet's Moon from Station Orbit

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the angle and speed required for a station in orbit to reach a planet's moon, one must consider the principles of tangential velocity and conservation of energy. An increase in velocity at a specific point in the orbit will alter the orbit's height, potentially transitioning it to an elliptical path. Clarification is needed on the term "opposite orbit," which may refer to the resulting trajectory after an impulse is applied. The problem also requires knowledge of the initial angular separation between the station and the moon, as this affects the timing and effectiveness of the impulse. Ultimately, the solution hinges on applying orbital mechanics principles to determine the optimal angle and velocity for the maneuver.
dirb
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Find angle and velocity
Relevant Equations
Unsure
A station is orbiting a planet at a distance R1, a moon is orbiting the planet at distance R2 with the period T. The planet itself has a radius rp and a mass mp. We know that when an object adds its velocity at a point in the orbit, the height of the opposite orbit will increase. Determine the angle $\theta$ and additional speed so that the station reaches the moon of the planet.

I was thinking that it has something to do with tangential velocity, and conservation of energy but I don't know how to write the maths? Which concepts should I use in this problem? thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dirb said:
Homework Statement:: Find angle and velocity
Relevant Equations:: Unsure

We know that when an object adds its velocity at a point in the orbit, the height of the opposite orbit will increase.
Unsure what is meant by "when an object adds its velocity". Do you mean "when an impulse is given to an object in orbit so as to increase its speed"?
And what is the "opposite orbit"? Is this a translation?

As to reaching the moon, a one time impulse to an object in a circular orbit will produce an elliptical one. And even if we got the station into the same circular orbit as the moon, it would necessarily be at the same period as the moon, so still might never reach it. I don't see how the question can be answered without knowing the initial angular separation of the bodies.

Edit: assuming the two given radii are different, the periods are different. Maybe we are to assume the impulse is given at the ideal point (the one requiring the least impulse) in their relative motions.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top