Calculating Annual Cost of Running Coffee Makers

  • Thread starter Thread starter STEMucator
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the annual cost of operating two coffee makers with a resistance of 15Ω each, connected to a 120V power supply, and used for two hours daily over a year. Participants are exploring the implications of their calculations and the assumptions involved in the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations for power consumption and cost, with one participant questioning the validity of the original poster's answer compared to a textbook figure. There are considerations about the configuration of the coffee makers (parallel vs. series) and its impact on the calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants agreeing on the correctness of the calculations while others express skepticism about the high costs suggested by the textbook. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the circuit configuration and its implications for the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential assumptions about the voltage distribution across the coffee makers and question the realism of the cost estimates provided in the problem statement.

STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140
Calculating yearly cost of running coffee makers

Homework Statement



Find the total cost for operating two 15Ω coffee makers connected to a 120V power supply for two hours a day each for one year.


Homework Equations



##R = 15Ω##
##V = 120V##
##∆t=(2h)(365)= 730h## Two hours each 365 days a year.
##r_¢=6.4¢/kWh##
##I = V/R = 8A##

There is some basic physics involved, it's the answer I'm concerned with arithmetically.

The Attempt at a Solution



I find the power of one coffee maker using :

##P = IV = (8A)(120V) = 0.96kW##

There are two coffee makers, so the total power is :

##P_{Total} = (2)(0.96kW) = 1.92kW##

The energy would then be :

##E = P_{Total}∆t = (1.92 kW)(730h) = 1401.6 kWh##

Therefore the total cost is :

##C = Er_¢ = (1401.6 kWh)(6.4¢/kWh) = 8970.24¢ = $89.70##

Is this correct? The answer is listed as $370.02 so I'm not so sure.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
that's odd. Your method and answer look correct to me.
 
Must be inflation.
 
BruceW said:
that's odd. Your method and answer look correct to me.

Yeah it didn't make any sense for two small coffee makers to be costing so much to run.

SteamKing said:
Must be inflation.

Lol! I wouldn't want to live if inflation was that high.
 
The smart money is to connect them in parallel to decrease the resistance.

Other than that I have nothing to add
 
(I think) the problem was assuming that there is 120V across each of the resistors. If it meant 120V across both resistors in series, then he would get half of his current answer. (which unfortunately still doesn't get the textbook's answer).
 
I can't get my head around it. There is no way a 120V coffee machine takes so much power that you'd have to pay 175 bucks per machine a year.

I'm going to go with it being the textbook's fault not your fault.

By that same logic - if I were to calculate how much my computer costs to keep running if it's on 24/7 I would be long broke.
 
Last edited:
BruceW said:
(I think) the problem was assuming that there is 120V across each of the resistors. If it meant 120V across both resistors in series, then he would get half of his current answer. (which unfortunately still doesn't get the textbook's answer).

I believe the two coffee makers are on separate circuits; so I don't think concepts about ##R_{eq}## can be applied here.
 
Zondrina said:
I believe the two coffee makers are on separate circuits; so I don't think concepts about ##R_{eq}## can be applied here.

Agreed, how weird would it be to have one coffee maker that hooks into the back of another one for electricity xD

If they were on a parallel circuit, presumably they'd still have 120V and 15 Ω no?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K