Calculating Buoyancy Force & Tension in Cable for 6m Spherical Chamber

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adam Y.
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the buoyancy force and tension in the cable for a 6-meter spherical undersea research chamber with a mass of 75,200 kg. The buoyant force is calculated using the formula F_B = (4/3)πr^3ρ_water g, yielding a result of approximately 8.87 x 106 N. Participants emphasize the importance of using the correct radius (3 m) and applying Newton's second law to determine the tension in the cable. Miscalculations stem from incorrect assumptions about volume and displacement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of buoyancy principles and Archimedes' principle
  • Familiarity with Newton's second law of motion
  • Basic knowledge of spherical volume calculations
  • Ability to perform unit conversions (e.g., diameter to radius)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of buoyancy force equations in fluid mechanics
  • Learn about tension calculations in static equilibrium scenarios
  • Explore the effects of varying densities of fluids on buoyancy
  • Investigate real-world applications of buoyancy in underwater engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, marine engineering, and underwater research who are involved in buoyancy calculations and tension analysis in submerged structures.

Adam Y.
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
An undersea research chamber for aquanauts is spherical with an external diameter of 6.0 m. The mass of the chamber, when occupied, is 75200 kg. It is anchored to the sea bottom by a cable.
(a) What is the buoyant force on the chamber?
N
(b) What is the tension in the cable?
N
What in am doing wrong? I assumed it's just the volume of the tank and then you find the weight of the water displaced. It's not working. I made sure that the diameter was changed into a radius for the volume of the sphere. Also as a sanity note, if you have a tank that sinks when it's empty it should still sink if it's full of air right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's really simple.
a)F_ {APXIMN\Delta N\Sigma} = V_{sphere}\rho_{water} g [/tex]<br /> <br /> That&#039;s the scalar.<br /> <br /> For point b),apply Newton&#039;s second law for the sphere.How many forces act on the batiscaph?<br /> <br /> Daniel.
 
It's really simple.
Yeah which is why I hate it when I get these problems wrong.:) I know that has to be the answer. I can't figure out why I am not getting the right number. Here is what I am getting. 1108353.888 Newtons.
 
dextercioby said:
F_ {APXIMN\Delta N\Sigma} = V_{sphere}\rho_{water} g [/tex]<br />
<br /> <br /> Dex why are you writing hieroglyphs for very simple formulas <img src="https://www.physicsforums.com/styles/physicsforums/xenforo/smilies/oldschool/bugeye.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":bugeye:" title="Bug Eye :bugeye:" data-shortname=":bugeye:" /> .<br /> <br /> Adam, F_B = \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3\rho_{w}g = F_B = \frac{4}{3}\pi (6m)^3(1000kg/m^3)(9.8m/s^2) = 8.87 * 10^6 N. <br /> Right?
 
Right?
Yeah. Your equation is right. Though don't you need to divide the diamter by two to get the radius? I checked neither of those two possible solutions are correct.
 
Last edited:
The problem I did like this used

<br /> \begin{multline*}<br /> \Sigma F_{y}=F_{b}-F_{t}-F_{g}\\F_{g}=ma<br /> \end{multline*}<br />

with gravity and tension in the negative y direction.
 
Last edited:
Ramollari,the radius is 3m...:wink:

Hey,hieroglyphs are from ancient Egypt.Those were capital Greek letters...Hey,you are Greek! :smile:

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K