Find the tension in the cable and reactive forces at ground

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 160-kg utility pole that is held vertically by a cable while a horizontal force of 250 N acts on its top. Participants are tasked with analyzing the forces acting on the pole, including drawing a free-body diagram, determining the tension in the cable, and identifying the reaction forces at the ground.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish a free-body diagram and equations for net torque and net force to analyze the system. They question the direction of friction and how to calculate it, while also exploring the relationship between the forces acting on the pole.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the original poster's work and provide insights on the nature of the friction force, suggesting it may not be kinetic since the pole is not sliding. They encourage the original poster to consider the horizontal component of the reaction force from the ground instead of focusing on friction coefficients. The discussion appears to be progressing with productive exchanges about the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the uncertainty regarding the direction of friction and the assumptions made about the forces acting on the pole. The original poster is also navigating the implications of their calculations and the definitions of forces involved.

jfnn

Homework Statement



A 160-kg utility pole extends 12m above the ground. A horizontal force of 250 N acts at its top and the pole is held in the vertical position by a cable, as shown in the figure (I have attached the photo).

1) draw a free-body diagram for the pole

2) Determine the tension in the cable

3) What are the reaction forces exerted at the lower end of the pole by the ground?

Homework Equations


[/B]
net torque = 0

net force = 0 (in x and y direction as well)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
a) The free body diagram:

1. Weight acts downwards at the center of the pole
2. Normal force acts upwards from the bottom of the pole
3. Tension acts in the same direction of the rope (shown in diagram) pulling outwards
4. The horizontal force applied (as shown in the diagram) acts in the same direction at the top
5. The friction (however, I am not sure what direction the friction acts because I do not know the direction of motion if the pole tips?) Any suggestions?

b) The tension is found by:

I defined the axis of rotation (o) at the bottom of the pole --> Therefore, the torque by the normal force, friction, and weight is zero

Thus, net torque = torque of horizontal force (Tf) - torque of tension (Tt) (with clockwise being negative)

Therefore,

Tf = r * F*sin (theta) --> Tf = 12 * 250 * sin (90) --> 3000 N*m
Tt = r* F * sin(theta) --> Tt = 8 * T * sin 55

net torque must equal zero for equilibrium --> Therefore,

0 = 3000 N*m - (6.5532T)
-3000 = -6.5532T
T=458 N --> Is this math right/approach correct?

c) The reactive forces at lower end of pole by ground is

1. The force of friction (would it be kinetic friction?)
I have no clue how to calculate this force...
I know friction kinetic = uk * N
I found N below, therefore --> kinetic friction = uK * (1.83*10^3)
How do I find uK?

2. Normal force
N = W + Ty (tension in y direction) --> N = mg + Tsin(theta) --> N = (160)(9.8)+458sin(35) --> N = 1.83 *10^3 N
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-08-06 at 8.33.29 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-08-06 at 8.33.29 PM.png
    7 KB · Views: 1,158
Physics news on Phys.org
The work that you've done so far looks good to me.

The friction force is an unknown. So, you don't know its direction at the beginning. You can just assume a direction and set up your equations according to this assumption. If calculation yields a negative value for the force, then you know it is actually in the opposite direction of your initial choice.

The friction would not be kinetic since the pole is presumably not sliding across the ground. In fact, the force is not necessary friction. The pole could be secured to the ground in some way. You can just call the force the "horizontal component of the reaction force from the ground". There is no need to worry about coefficients of friction.

To find the horizontal component of the reaction force, use the same method as you did to find N.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jfnn
TSny said:
The work that you've done so far looks good to me.

The friction force is an unknown. So, you don't know its direction at the beginning. You can just assume a direction and set up your equations according to this assumption. If calculation yields a negative value for the force, then you know it is actually in the opposite direction of your initial choice.

The friction would not be kinetic since the pole is presumably not sliding across the ground. In fact, the force is not necessary friction. The pole could be secured to the ground in some way. You can just call the force the "horizontal component of the reaction force from the ground". There is no need to worry about coefficients of friction.

To find the horizontal component of the reaction force, use the same method as you did to find N.

Thank you for your response. So the two forces are the normal force, which I found. Then the second would be the horizontal reactive force from the ground.

Since I know the sum of the forces in the x direction must equal zero, then I can say (with the east direction positive):

The horizontal reactive force of ground (f) + the tension in the x direction (Tx) - the horizontal applied force (F) = 0

f + Tx - F = 0 where f is unknown, F = 250 N, and Tx = 458*sin(55)

Thus,

f + 458*sin(55) - 250 = 0
f = -125.17

So... since it is negative, it is in the opposite direction that I originally defined... Therefore, it is pointing to the left at the bottom of the pole?
 
Looks good. Yes, the horizontal reaction force on the pole is to the left.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jfnn
TSny said:
Looks good. Yes, the horizontal reaction force on the pole is to the left.
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K