Calculating Change in Electric Potential Energy

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 2K views
baker265
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The electric field in a particular region of space is found to be uniform, with a magnitude of 700 N/C and parallel to the +y direction.

(a) What is the change in electric potential energy of a charge [q = 6.5 mu or micro CC if it is moved from [(x, y) = (20 cm, 45 cm)] to [(5 cm, 30 cm)]? Answer in mJ.

(b) What is the change in electric potential energy if the charge is moved the same distance along the x axis? Answer in mJ.

Are my attempts correct?


Homework Equations


q*E*d



The Attempt at a Solution


(a) (6.5e-6)*700*(.015) = .06825 mJ
(b) (6.5e-6)*700*.015*√(2) = .09652 mJ
 
Physics news on Phys.org
baker265 said:

Homework Statement


The electric field in a particular region of space is found to be uniform, with a magnitude of 700 N/C and parallel to the +y direction.

(a) What is the change in electric potential energy of a charge [q = 6.5 mu or micro CC if it is moved from [(x, y) = (20 cm, 45 cm)] to [(5 cm, 30 cm)]? Answer in mJ.

(b) What is the change in electric potential energy if the charge is moved the same distance along the x axis? Answer in mJ.

Are my attempts correct?


Homework Equations


q*E*d



The Attempt at a Solution


(a) (6.5e-6)*700*(.015) = .06825 mJ
(b) (6.5e-6)*700*.015*√(2) = .09652 mJ
(a) looks right.

(b) is not right. How much work must be done on the particle in part (b) ?
 
baker265 said:

Homework Statement


The electric field in a particular region of space is found to be uniform, with a magnitude of 700 N/C and parallel to the +y direction.

(a) What is the change in electric potential energy of a charge [q = 6.5 mu or micro CC if it is moved from [(x, y) = (20 cm, 45 cm)] to [(5 cm, 30 cm)]? Answer in mJ.

(b) What is the change in electric potential energy if the charge is moved the same distance along the x axis? Answer in mJ.

Are my attempts correct?


Homework Equations


q*E*d



The Attempt at a Solution


(a) (6.5e-6)*700*(.015) = .06825 mJ
15 cm is 0.15 m, not 0.015 m.

By the way, I have to ask, where did you come up with the distance (I presume 15 cm)? I'm not necessarily saying your method was right or wrong, but there is one right way to get this.

(b) (6.5e-6)*700*.015*√(2) = .09652 mJ

That doesn't look correct to me (which is the reason I asked the question above).

The work done on the particle is [itex]W = q \vec E \cdot \vec d[/itex]. That dot isn't just a simple multiplication sign, it is the vector dot product.
 
I got the distance from subtracting 45cm by 30cm
 
baker265 said:
I got the distance from subtracting 45cm by 30cm

Okay, that's the right approach! :approve: You used the difference in the y-component, which is correct, since the y-component is the one along the direction of electric field. (Well, actually it's opposite the direction of the electric field, but since we're talking about the particle's gain of potential energy rather than kinetic energy, the positive sign works out).

[Edit: Oh, and by the way, don't forget to redo the calculation with 0.15 m instead of 0.015 m.]

Now what about part (b)? What's the dot product in that case?
 
Awesome! i was able to fix A properly. Thank you!

b)The answer from A*.15?
 
baker265 said:
b)The answer from A*.15?

Sorry, that's not it either.

Consider two vectors (and I'll just use 2-dimensions for this)
[tex]\vec A = A_x \hat x + A_y \hat y[/tex]
[tex]\vec B = B_x \hat x + B_y \hat y[/tex]
(Some textbooks use [itex]\hat \imath[/itex] instead of [itex]\hat x[/itex], and [itex]\hat \jmath[/itex] instead of [itex]\hat y[/itex].)

The dot product is
[tex]\vec A \cdot \vec B = A_x B_x + A_y B_y[/tex]

For this problem (part (b)), there are two vectors [itex]\vec E[/itex] and [itex]\vec d[/itex]. The vector [itex]\vec E[/itex] points along the y-axis and [itex]\vec d[/itex] points along the x-axis.

So what are [itex]E_x, \ E_y, \ d_x[/itex] and [itex]d_y \ ?[/itex]
 
If you're not comfortable with that approach, here is another. One can also say,
[tex]\vec A \cdot \vec B = AB \cos \theta.[/tex]
You know that [itex]\vec d[/itex] points along the x-axis (for part (b)). And you know [itex]\vec E[/itex] points along the y-axis. What is the angle θ between the x- and y- axes?

So what does that make [itex]E d \cos \theta[/itex] ?
 
Would theta be 0 degree or 6.41 degree? I got 6.41 by (45/20)^2+(30/5)^2=c^2 => sqrt(41.0625)=>6.41 degree. Can I do that?

To plug into that equation it would be (.6825*10^-3)*.15*6.41=10.158 mJ
 
baker265 said:
Would theta be 0 degree or 6.41 degree? I got 6.41 by (45/20)^2+(30/5)^2=c^2 => sqrt(41.0625)=>6.41 degree. Can I do that?

To plug into that equation it would be (.6825*10^-3)*.15*6.41=10.158 mJ

Maybe we are not interpreting part (b) of the problem statement in the same way. Recall part (b):
"(b) What is the change in electric potential energy if the charge is moved the same distance along the x axis?"​
Personally, I interpret that as saying the charge is moved the same total distance as it was in part (a), but with a direction that is completely along the x axis. In other words, there is no displacement along the y-axis or z axis. The only displacement is along the x axis.

Is that not the way you interpret part (b) the problem statement? Maybe I'm interpreting it incorrectly. What do you think?