Calculating % Change in Inductance of Search Coil in Metal Detector

  • Thread starter Thread starter arod2812
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits Current
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the percentage change in inductance of a search coil in a heterodyne metal detector when a metal object is nearby. The resonant frequency of the oscillator circuits is initially 430 kHz, and upon detecting a buried object, a beat frequency of 4.1 kHz is observed. The inductance values were calculated using the formula f = 1/(2π√(LC)), leading to inductance values of LA = 1.37E-13 H and LB = 1.51E-9 H. The percentage change in inductance is determined by the formula ((LA - LB) / LB) * 100.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inductance and resonant frequency in electrical circuits
  • Familiarity with the formula for resonant frequency: f = 1/(2π√(LC))
  • Basic knowledge of beat frequency in oscillatory systems
  • Ability to perform percentage change calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of inductance in metal detectors
  • Learn about beat frequency and its implications in oscillatory systems
  • Study the effects of nearby conductive materials on inductance
  • Explore advanced calculations involving resonant circuits and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Students in electrical engineering, hobbyists building metal detectors, and anyone interested in the principles of inductance and resonant frequency in circuits.

arod2812
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the absence of a nearby metal object, the two inductances LA and LB in a heterodyne metal detector are the same, and the resonant frequencies of the two oscillator circuits have the same value of 430 kHz. When the search coil (inductor B) is brought near a buried metal object, a beat frequency of 4.1 kHz is heard. By what percentage does the buried object reduce the inductance of the search coil?


Homework Equations


I don't understand how the inductance REDUCES (as the question says) because the frequency decreases, so I would expect the inductance to increase. I am also confused about how to calculate percent change.

The Attempt at a Solution


f=1/(2*pi*SqRt(LC) . . . capacitance remains the same and is therefore a constant...
430000 Hz = 1/ (2*pi*SqRt(L)) --> La=1.37E-13
and
4100 Hz = 1/(2*pi*SqRt(L)) --> Lb=1.51E-9

I then took the difference between these two inductance values and divided by Lb to get the % change. I don't think I have the right answer though. IS ANY OF THIS CORRECT?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arod2812 said:

Homework Statement


In the absence of a nearby metal object, the two inductances LA and LB in a heterodyne metal detector are the same, and the resonant frequencies of the two oscillator circuits have the same value of 430 kHz. When the search coil (inductor B) is brought near a buried metal object, a beat frequency of 4.1 kHz is heard. By what percentage does the buried object reduce the inductance of the search coil?


Homework Equations


I don't understand how the inductance REDUCES (as the question says) because the frequency decreases, so I would expect the inductance to increase.
If a beat frequency of 4.1 KHz is heard, that means that the difference between the frequencies of the two coils is 4.1KHz. The frequency in the sense coil can be higher

The Attempt at a Solution


f=1/(2*pi*SqRt(LC) . . . capacitance remains the same and is therefore a constant...
430000 Hz = 1/ (2*pi*SqRt(L)) --> La=1.37E-13
It's clearer to keep 1/sqrt(C) in this answer or replace 2*pi/sqrt(C) by a constant. It will divide off later. The rest of your work is correct if you use the correct frequency.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K