Calculating distance, acceleration and time

  • Thread starter Thread starter agargento
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a physics problem involving a truck traveling at 28.0 km/hr and a car accelerating at 3.8 m/s² from a stoplight. The key equations used include V=V0+at and r(t)=r0+v0t+0.5a². Participants identified errors in the initial calculations, particularly in the application of uniformly accelerated motion equations. Ultimately, a correct solution was derived using the equation x(t) = 110.7 + 0.5 * 3.8 * t² - (28/3.6) * t, confirming the accuracy of the numerical values provided in the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of uniformly accelerated motion equations
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations
  • Basic knowledge of speed and acceleration concepts
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of kinematic equations in physics
  • Learn about the implications of initial velocity and acceleration on motion
  • Explore real-world applications of uniformly accelerated motion
  • Investigate common pitfalls in solving physics problems involving multiple objects
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in solving motion-related problems in mechanics.

agargento
Messages
38
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


To save fuel, some truck drivers try to maintain a constant speed when possible. A truck traveling at 28.0 km/hr approaches a car stopped at the red light. When the truck is 110.7 meters from the car the light turns green and the car immediately begins to accelerate at 3.8 m/s2. How close does the truck come to the car assuming the truck does not slow down?

Homework Equations


Equations used:

V=V0+at
and r(t)=r0+v0t+0.5a2

The Attempt at a Solution


my attempt: http://imgur.com/RHuv2tq
RHuv2tq.jpg

I got an incorrect answer, what did i get wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did I manage to get my reply across before the good spirit that watches over us took action ?

I asked you to check Dcar: that's not the expression for uniformly accelerated linear motion.

[edit] Oh, I see: you mixed them up. Nevertheless, answer's incorrect: you want to check what you do with the signs

By the way, the numerical values in this exercise are strange (truck speed very low wrt distance)
 
BvU said:
Did I manage to get my reply across before the good spirit that watches over us took action ?

I asked you to check Dcar: that's not the expression for uniformly accelerated linear motion.

[edit] Oh, I see: you mixed them up. Nevertheless, answer's incorrect: you want to check what you do with the signs

By the way, the numerical values in this exercise are strange (truck speed very low wrt distance)

Sorry, I didn't completely understand where the problem is?
 
It looks like you have the car and truck equations reversed. Also, I think your final equation would indicate that the vehicles are headed toward each other.
 
BvU said:
By the way, the numerical values in this exercise are strange (truck speed very low wrt distance)
You know, that's what I thought when I worked out the result - that the numbers were kind of strange. I was wondering if the acceleration number might have been wrong; it seems kind of high. But you're right that the truck's speed seems very low also. @agargento, please check that you copied all of the values correctly.
 
TomHart said:
You know, that's what I thought when I worked out the result - that the numbers were kind of strange. I was wondering if the acceleration number might have been wrong; it seems kind of high. But you're right that the truck's speed seems very low also. @agargento, please check that you copied all of the values correctly.

Hey, I got the correct result eventually, the numbers are correct. I've built an equation of their distance x(t) = 110.7 + 0.5 * 3.8 * t^2 -(28/3.6) * t and used the time I found to find the minimal distance, and it was correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TomHart
agargento said:
Hey, I got the correct result eventually, the numbers are correct.
Okay good. Glad to hear that. My personal opinion though is that the problem writers should add a little more drama and suspense. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K