Calculating Electric Potential Energy for a Charge Configuration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential energy for a specific charge configuration involving three charges. The original poster presents an equation for total potential energy and seeks clarification on its correctness and the necessity of including certain terms.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to compute total potential energy using a specific equation and questions the inclusion of potential energy terms related to different charge interactions. Some participants provide feedback on the equation's structure and suggest that the total potential energy should consider each pair of charges.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the validity of the original poster's equation and the rationale behind including certain potential energy terms. There is acknowledgment of the equation's correctness, but clarity on specific terms remains a point of inquiry.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of a visual representation of the charge configuration, which may affect the clarity of the discussion. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the necessity of calculating potential energy for one charge due to another while focusing on a specific charge.

synergix
Messages
177
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Compute the electric potential energy for the charge configuration shown below.

http://webct6.nic.bc.ca/webct/RelativeResourceManager/Template/CourseMaterials/CourseContent_2007FA/Assignments/PHY060W_Assignment_07_files/image025.jpg


Homework Equations



TPE=PE11+PE12+(PE13+PE23)

The Attempt at a Solution



TPE=PE11+PE12+(PE13+PE23)
| TPE= 0J+[(q1KQ2)/r2] + [(q1KQ3)/r1 + (q2KQ3)/r3]
|
q1=-3.0 microcoloumb
q2=2.0microcoloumb
q3=5.0microcoloumb

| where q1 is charge 1, q2 and Q2 are charge 2, Q3 is charge 3, r1 is the distance between q1 and Q3, r2 is the distance between charge 1 and 2, r3 is the distance between q2 and Q3.

I have chosen charge one to base my calculations off. I had problems before with this question and I was instructed to find charge one due to charge one + PE on charge one due to charge 2 + (PE on charge 1 due to charge 3 + PE on charge 2 due to charge 3) I am not sure why I need to calculate the potential energy on charge 2 due to charge 3. So I need to know if my equation is correct and also why I need to calculate the potential energy of charge 2 due to charge 3 when I am using charge one to base my calculations off of?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Without seeing a figure showing the charges, I will say that the total potential energy is the potential due to each pair of charges.

Your equation looks correct. Not sure why you bothered with the "PE11" term, since it's just 0, or why you chose to use different symbols (q2 and Q2) for one of the charges. But it is correct. If the figure shows what r1, r2, and r3 are, you can go ahead and plug in the numbers.
 
Ok thanks I used the small q to indicate that it was the charge being acted upon by the big Q. I believe that is what is happening. its just personal preference I suppose albeit kinda pointless and possibly confusing if you don't know why I am doing that.
 
sorry for the double post
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K