Calculating (f of g)(3): Find the Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter tecrekka
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the composition of functions, specifically calculating (f of g)(3) where f(x) is defined as sqrt(x) and g(x) as x + 1. Participants are attempting to clarify the correct interpretation and execution of function composition.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the correct way to substitute values in function composition, with some confusion about the notation and the order of operations. There are attempts to clarify the difference between multiplying functions and composing them.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing clarification regarding the proper evaluation of the functions involved. Some participants have pointed out misunderstandings in the original poster's approach, while others are trying to guide the discussion towards a clearer understanding of function composition.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the notation used for f(x), with one participant questioning its validity. Additionally, there are repeated inquiries about substituting values directly into the functions, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the composition process.

tecrekka
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(f of g)

f(x)= sqrt/x

g(x) = x+1

Homework Equations



(f of g)(3)

The Attempt at a Solution



sqrt/3 (4) = 4(sqrt/3) (incorrect)

Correct answer is 2 but I don't see how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
f(x)=sqrt/x has no sense. Is not it f(x)= sqrt(x)?

ehild
 
You are absolutely correct, sorry, I see now that I put it in improperly. I've made it harder^2
 
You are doing in your working (f * g), not (f of g). In the latter, you pass the result of g to f.
 
I'm just not seeing what you are saying for some reason, if (x)=3 don't I substitute every (x) with 3?
 
tecrekka said:
I'm just not seeing what you are saying for some reason, if (x)=3 don't I substitute every (x) with 3?
No, not at all. To evaluate f(g(3)) you need to evaluate g(3), and then use that number in f.

For example, if g(3) = 5 -- I'm just making up numbers here -- then you would evaluate f(5). That would be f(g(3)).
 
OH! I see! Thank you very much.
 
tecrekka said:
I'm just not seeing what you are saying for some reason, if (x)=3 don't I substitute every (x) with 3?
I would say "yes, you do", but that [itex]fog(x)= f(g(x))[/itex] only has one x!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K