Calculating Flux Density and Induced Voltage in a Linear Induction Flashlight

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating flux density and induced voltage for a linear induction flashlight project. The participant seeks clarity on applying Faraday's law, particularly regarding the change in magnetic flux and its relation to the coil's orientation. They have measured a magnetic field strength of 1006.842 Gauss but are uncertain about its implications for their design. Suggestions include constructing a 3D magnetic field model and using approximations, such as treating the magnet as two magnetic monopoles, to simplify calculations. Understanding the relationship between the speed of the magnet and induced current is also emphasized as crucial for the project.
radaballer
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
For my science fair i am attempting to make a linear induction flashlight. I am a bit confused on how to demonstrate the scientific effects mathematically. I would greatly appreciate any help. Farradays law states
EMF= -N(change in flux/ change in time). I am confused about how to find the change in flux. I have found the magnetic field to be 1006.842 Gauss at one inches away from the AXIS. Can i plug this figure into faraday's equation with respect to my design below? My concern is that the flux density at the axis will not accurately reflect the flux density which acts upon the the coil, which is not perpendicular to the axis. If i am correct, the induced voltage is contingent on the the field lines perpendicular to the direction of the current. Also, how do i demonstrate the implication of the magnets speed when shaken on the induced voltage ? Any contributions are appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Photo on 9-30-14 at 2.03 PM #2.jpg
    Photo on 9-30-14 at 2.03 PM #2.jpg
    19 KB · Views: 564
Physics news on Phys.org
You need better information about the field of your magnet. Make more measurements of the magnet until you can construct the 3D magnetic field from the magnet. You can probably treat the bar magnet as being comprised of two magnetic monopoles (this is only a mathematical trick; monopoles [probably] don't exist), so all you need to fully define the field is distance between monopoles and strength of each monopole.
 
  • Like
Likes radaballer
Ok thanks Is there a configuration program for this? Also, how is the speed of the magnet related to the induced current? Is there a formula for this? Also, say i make a 3d diagram of the mag field, how do i know which field lines will induce current?
 
Last edited:
You already wrote the formula up above. What you need to do is calculate the rate of change in the flux, which isn't so easy, but should be doable with a bit of vector calculus. How much mathematics do you know?
 
Not enough to do that haha, but i will figure it out. Where do i start with solving this?
Khashishi said:
You already wrote the formula up above. What you need to do is calculate the rate of change in the flux, which isn't so easy, but should be doable with a bit of vector calculus. How much mathematics do you know?
 
I have no problem solving this, but I can't give you all the answers. You can simplify the problem a lot by making some approximations. If you represent the bar magnet by two magnetic monopoles (go read up on how to do this), the flux is fairly simple. You can use Gauss's law to calculate the flux from each magnetic monopole through each loop. How much solid angle does each loop subtend? The total flux is the sum of the flux from each monopole, thanks to the superposition principle. Then let the bar magnet move, and calculate the rate of change.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
984
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
793
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
951
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K