Calculating Focal Length of 1D Fresnel Lens

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the focal length of a 1D Fresnel lens, with a specific transmittance function provided. Participants are exploring the implications of the transmittance on the behavior of a plane wave and how it relates to Fresnel diffraction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use a diffraction equation involving the lens transmittance but expresses uncertainty about its utility. Other participants suggest considering the implications of the transmittance function and how it affects wave behavior.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the setup and exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the integrals involved, but there is no explicit consensus on the next steps or resolution of confusion.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the imaginary components in the exponents of the integrals, which some participants suggest may not be a significant concern. The discussion is framed within the context of homework constraints, emphasizing the exploratory nature of the problem.

skrat
Messages
740
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Calculate the focal length of 1D Fresnel lens, whose transmittance is given as $$T(\xi)=\frac 1 2(1+\cos(\alpha \xi ^2)).$$

Homework Equations


Anything you wish

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea. I tried to use the equation for diffraction image $$u_p=C\int _0 ^{R_p}T(\xi)e^{ik\frac{r^2}{2z}}rdr$$ which is simply a Fresnel diffraction multiplied with lens transmittance. I thought this would bring me to something useful, but I couldn't see how this would help.

Any ideas/hints on how to solve this problem would be highly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anything you wish
... nope, it's anything you choose ... part of the point of this section is to tell us how you are thinking about the problem. We already know how we are thinking of the problem.

I have no idea.
You could try looking at your notes - consider: what does the transmittance function tell you?
How would you use the transmittance function to work out how a plane wave would be affected?
I thought this would bring me to something useful, but I couldn't see how this would help.
... so you did have some idea - did you follow through on it?
Sometimes you won't be able to see how something will turn out until after you'd gone down the path for a bit.

Also see:
http://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ee290f/fa04/Lenses_post.pdf
 
The problem is here:
$$u_f=C\int T(\xi)e^{i\frac{k}{2R}\xi ^2}d\xi=C\int \frac 1 2(1+\cos(\alpha \xi^2))e^{i\frac{k}{2R}\xi ^2}d\xi=$$ $$=C\int \frac 1 2 (1+\frac 1 2(e^{i\alpha \xi ^2}+e^{-i\alpha \xi ^2}))e^{i\frac{k}{2R}\xi ^2}d\xi=$$ $$=C\int[\frac 1 2e^{i\frac{k}{2R}\xi ^2}+\frac 1 4 e^{i(\frac{k}{2R}-\alpha)\xi ^2}+\frac 1 4 e^{i(\frac{k}{2R}+\alpha)\xi ^2}]d\xi$$
In in the focal point the intensity (which is ##\propto |u_f|^2##) should have a huge peak. And from the equation above I should be able to already see that. Yet I don't. I am confused because of the imaginary argument in my exponents. How do I in this case find out where the peak is? :/
 
skrat said:
I am confused because of the imaginary argument in my exponents.
You shouldn't be too concerned about this. These integrals are a variant of Gaussian integrals and they have the form:-
##\int_0^x e^{t^2}\ dt = -i\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}erf(ix)##
where ##erf(ix)## is the error function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K