Calculating force during motor stoppage

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the forces experienced by a motor with a flywheel during the process of stopping. Participants explore the relationship between motor geometry, torque, and the forces acting on the motor's mount. The conversation also touches on energy dissipation during braking and the implications of different braking methods, including electrical and mechanical braking.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the force on the surface is equivalent to the centripetal force of the flywheel, but expresses uncertainty about this assumption.
  • Another participant argues that the force depends on motor geometry and the torque applied to the load, dismissing the relevance of centripetal force.
  • Participants discuss the importance of free body diagrams and concepts like static equilibrium and Newton's third law in understanding the forces involved.
  • Torque is defined in terms of force and distance from the axis, with a focus on how torque relates to the forces acting on the motor's mount.
  • There is a discussion about the role of angular acceleration and moment of inertia in determining the forces during motor stoppage.
  • Some participants express confusion about the relationship between energy stored in the flywheel and the forces acting on the motor's mount during braking.
  • It is noted that electrical braking methods convert energy into electrical energy, while mechanical braking may provide sufficient braking torque.
  • One participant questions whether electrical braking can convert energy into mechanical force, given sufficient braking torque.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the exact nature of the forces during motor stoppage, with multiple competing views on the relevance of energy, torque, and braking methods remaining unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the application of equations related to torque and forces, particularly in the context of momentary forces during motor stoppage. There are also discussions about the assumptions underlying the definitions of force and energy in braking scenarios.

andrey-g
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
When a motor with a flywheel spins up and then stops, what is the force translated on the surface onto which the motor is connected? I'm assuming the value of this force equals to the centripetal force in the flywheel, but I'm not sure.

The setup: http://imgur.com/IiOrRoQ

How does the force change if flywheel's weight isn't distributed uniformly across the volume?

How does the energy dissipated inside the motor come into the calculation?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The force depends on the motor geometry and the torque the motor applies to it's load.
Centripetal force is not relevant.
Can you draw a free body diagram? Do you know Newtons third law? Are you familiar with the term 'static equilibrium'?

andrey-g said:
How does the energy dissipated inside the motor come into the calculation?
No, not unless you are finding the torque out from electrical power in.
 
billy_joule said:
The force depends on the motor geometry and the torque the motor applies to it's load.
Can you tell me more about this?

billy_joule said:
Can you draw a free body diagram? Do you know Newtons third law? Are you familiar with the term 'static equilibrium'?
I made the FBD, but I'm not sure what information I could get out of it, since I need to find F_motor as a function of flywheel mass and speed.

bd9UAzT.png
 
andrey-g said:
Can you tell me more about this?
Torque is defined as T=Fr. The motor casing is not accelerating so all torques and forces must sum to zero.
if we call the horizontal distance between the shaft axis and a mounting bolt 'r' then we have:
(letting anticlockwise be positive)
ΣT = 0 = Fbaser + Fscrewr - Tmotor

So as r gets larger, the force on the screw gets smaller.

I made the FBD, but I'm not sure what information I could get out of it, since I need to find F_motor as a function of flywheel mass and speed.
Nice diagram.
The speed of the flywheel doesn't matter. What matters is the torque the motor applies to it's load.
If the motor is accelerating the flywheel then the torque can be found via:
T = Iα
Where I is the moment of inertia (found from the geometry and mass of the flywheel)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_of_inertia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_moments_of_inertia

and α is angular acceleration:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_acceleration

If the motor is hoisting a weight or something at a constant velocity then the torque can be found via one of the other definitions:
T =Fr
T = P/ω
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torque
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't equations above valid only when the motor is continuously running?
I'm interested in momentary forces occurring when the motor stops.
 
andrey-g said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't equations above valid only when the motor is continuously running?
I'm interested in momentary forces occurring when the motor stops.
They apply at all times, a motor must decelerate to stop. The torque during which can be found via T=Iα. The motor can apply torque without moving at all, in fact many (most?) motors apply their greatest torque at 0rpm; stall torque.
 
billy_joule said:
They apply at all times, a motor must decelerate to stop. The torque during which can be found via T=Iα. The motor can apply torque without moving at all, in fact many (most?) motors apply their greatest torque at 0rpm; stall torque.

So what you're saying is that the force created during the stoppage is a function of moment and inertia and α (in this case α is angular de-acceleration from ω to 0)?

This is confusing to me because in my mind, the higher the energy stored in a flywheel (W = I ω2 / 2), the higher the force acting on the block will be, because that energy has to go somewhere.
 
andrey-g said:
So what you're saying is that the force created during the stoppage is a function of moment and inertia and α (in this case α is angular de-acceleration from ω to 0)?

That's right. But more directly,The force depends on the braking torque the motor applies to the flywheel.

This is confusing to me because in my mind, the higher the energy stored in a flywheel (W = I ω2 / 2), the higher the force acting on the block will be, because that energy has to go somewhere.
No energy goes to the block, as no work is done on the block (as W=Fd will show). All the flywheels energy is transferred to the motor as it brakes. This (now electrical) energy is either dumped as heat (rheostatic braking) or may go back to the power supply (regenerative braking):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_braking
If the motor applies constant power then the force value will not be constant, it'll go from some minimum up to max as ω approaches zero. The rate of deceleration will also vary (ie α will increase as ω decreases).
If α is constant then the force on the block will be constant but the braking power will go from some maximum down to zero as ω reaches zero.
 
Last edited:
billy_joule said:
That's right. But more directly,The force depends on the braking torque the motor applies to the flywheel.

No energy goes to the block, as no work is done on the block (as W=Fd will show). All the flywheels energy is transferred to the motor as it brakes. This (now electrical) energy is either dumped as heat (rheostatic braking) or may go back to the power supply (regenerative braking).

My original idea was to stop the motor by power reversal as I've heard it leads to best stopping times. But if I've understood you correctly, all electrical stopping methods result in energy being converted into electrical energy?

That would explain why Cubli (link to paper in PDF), my original inspiration for the question, uses mechanical braking.
 
  • #10
The Cubli looks like a cool project, are you trying to make one?
andrey-g said:
My original idea was to stop the motor by power reversal as I've heard it leads to best stopping times. But if I've understood you correctly, all electrical stopping methods result in energy being converted into electrical energy?
Yes that's right. That energy can be dumped as heat in the motor windings as long as it's not so much or so often that the motor overheats. I am far from an expert though, I studied mechanical engineering not electrical.

That would explain why Cubli (link to paper in PDF), my original inspiration for the question, uses mechanical braking.
To me, the paper implies they couldn't get sufficient braking torque from the motor alone so has to resort to a more primitive approach (ie slam the flywheel into a stop). Maybe you'll find a better approach. Have you looked for more recent work? It's been 4 years, maybe they found a more elegant solution for the final design?
 
  • #11
billy_joule said:
The Cubli looks like a cool project, are you trying to make one?
No, just trying to figure out how much force can be extracted from this kind of device to confine a potential area of application.

billy_joule said:
To me, the paper implies they couldn't get sufficient braking torque from the motor alone so has to resort to a more primitive approach (ie slam the flywheel into a stop).
So... is it that electrical braking can only convert energy stored in the flywheel into electrical energy inside the windings or is it actually possible to convert it to a mechanical force (given large enough braking torque)?
 
  • #12
andrey-g said:
So... is it that electrical braking can only convert energy stored in the flywheel into electrical energy inside the windings or is it actually possible to convert it to a mechanical force (given large enough braking torque)?

When the motor applies a braking torque to the flywheel the motor must apply force to its mount as in post #4.
I think your confusion stems from your understanding of force and energy - you can apply a large force without expending any energy (eg like a boulder sitting on the ground does, or a motor applying force to it's mount). No energy goes to the motor mount as no work is done on the mount*, the flywheels energy is going elsewhere.

This concept applies to pretty much all braking types eg traditional frictional braking - when you brake in your car, its kinetic energy is converted to heat and dissipated from the brake pads and discs, no energy is transferred to the brake mounts.
If you brake in a Prius or sim. its kinetic energy is converted to electricity and sent back to the battery pack. The result is identical in each case - the cars kinetic energy is transferred elsewhere so the car slows down. ( I think a Prius still uses traditional brakes during hard braking as the electric motor braking cannot provide enough torque - a lot like the Cubli)

*note that the Cubli is a little different as some work is done on the mount during braking when/if tipping occurs, in which case work is done to raise the Cubli's centre of mass and increases its kinetic energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K