Calculating Force Exerted by Laser Beam on a Mirror

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 41K views
Matthaeus_
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A laser beam ([tex]\mathrm{Power} = 1\ \mathrm{W})[/tex] is completely reflected by a mirror perpendicular to the beam. Light is made of photons, and each photon carries an energy [tex]E = h\nu[/tex] and a momentum [tex]P = h/\lambda[/tex], where [tex]\nu[/tex] is the frequency, [tex]\lambda[/tex] is the wavelength and [tex]h[/tex] is Planck's constant. Find the force with which light pushes the mirror.

Homework Equations


Apart from those already present in the problem statement, I have:
[tex]\lambda \nu = c[/tex]

[tex]F = \frac{dp}{dt}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Each second, the light source emits [tex]n[/tex] photons, each one carries an energy [tex]E = h\nu = hc/\lambda[/tex], for a total power of [tex]1\ \mathrm{W}[/tex]. This gives:

[tex]\displaystyle n = \frac P E = \frac{\lambda}{hc}[/tex]

In one second then, [tex]n[/tex] photons hit the mirror and bounce back, which gives:

[tex]\displaystyle F = \frac{dp}{dt} = n \cdot 2p = 2 \frac{\lambda}{hc}\cdot \frac{h}{\lambda} = \frac 2 c \approx 6.67\cdot 10^{-9}\ \mathrm{N}[/tex]

The result is somewhat intuitively pleasing, can you check it is correct, please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whew... Thank you Doc for checking :)
 
Sorry to dig up such an old question, but after looking at this question, I don't understand were the 2 comes from in the F=n2p. Could someone explain this to me?
Thanks
 
The momentum is twice the incoming photon's because it bounces back
Think of a ball, if you throw it to hit a wall and stop then you need twice as much force for it to hit the wall and come back at the same speed.
 
That is to say, if it was not a mirror, and the light did not reflect off the surface, the 2 would be a 1 instead?
 
faiyth said:
Sorry to dig up such an old question, but after looking at this question, I don't understand were the 2 comes from in the F=n2p.
It comes from the fact that the change in momentum is twice the original momentum.