MHB Calculating g(x) for Y=f(x) Passing Through Points

  • Thread starter Thread starter AndreArgo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
AndreArgo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Y=f(x)
which passes through points:
(-1,3) and (0,2) and (1,0) and (2,1) and (3,5)
second function is defined: g(x)=2f(x-1)

Calculate g(0)
Calculate g(1)
Calculate g(2)
Calculate g(3)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
AndreArgo said:
Y=f(x)
which passes through points:
(-1,3) and (0,2) and (1,0) and (2,1) and (3,5)
second function is defined: g(x)=2f(x-1)

Calculate g(0)
Calculate g(1)
Calculate g(2)
Calculate g(3)

Hello, and welcome to MHB! (Wave)

We are given:

$$g(x)=2f(x-1)$$

We are also given 5 points in the form:

$$(x,f(x))$$

And so:

$$g(0)=2f(0-1)=2f(-1)=2\cdot3=6$$

Does that make sense? Can you continue?
 
MarkFL said:
Hello, and welcome to MHB! (Wave)

We are given:

$$g(x)=2f(x-1)$$

We are also given 5 points in the form:

$$(x,f(x))$$

And so:

$$g(0)=2f(0-1)=2f(-1)=2\cdot3=6$$

Does that make sense? Can you continue?
Just figured it out. Thank you Mark
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top