Total Potential of a Ring at Point P

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at point P due to a ring of mass, represented by the equation x² + y² = R². Participants explore the use of elliptic integrals, specifically the elliptic integral of the first kind, in deriving the potential. A coordinate transformation approach is suggested to simplify the problem, allowing for the integration of the mass elements along the ring. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly defining the coordinate system to accurately compute the potential.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and its mathematical formulation
  • Familiarity with elliptic integrals, particularly the elliptic integral of the first kind
  • Knowledge of coordinate transformations in three-dimensional space
  • Basic principles of calculus, specifically integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of elliptic integrals in physics
  • Learn about coordinate transformations and their role in simplifying complex integrals
  • Explore the derivation of electric potential from continuous mass distributions
  • Investigate the implications of different coordinate systems on physical calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism, mathematical physics, and applied mathematics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to understand the complexities of calculating potentials from non-trivial mass distributions.

Hamiltonian
Messages
296
Reaction score
193
Homework Statement
a uniform ring of mass M and radius R is tilted at an angle theta. find the gravitational potential at a point P at a distance r from the center of the ring.
Relevant Equations
gravitational potential = GM/r
I tried finding the potential due to a small element dM of the ring let's say dV, the summation of dV for all the dM's of the ring will give the potential at the point P, but since every element dM of the ring is at a different distance from the point P I am unable to come up with a differential equation to find the potential at P.
 

Attachments

  • tilted ring.jpeg
    tilted ring.jpeg
    27.2 KB · Views: 181
Physics news on Phys.org
You can take the ring as
x^2+y^2=R^2 or
(x,y,z)=(R \cos\phi,R \sin\phi,0),\ 0<\phi<2\pi
and P
(P_x,P_y,P_z)=(r\sin\theta, 0, r \cos\theta)
Then you can calculate the distance between.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Is it possible to obtain an algebraic expression? When I set it up, I ended up with an elliptic integral ?:)
 
whats an elliptic integral
 
In general an elliptic integral cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions. The solution I found involved the elliptic integral of the first kind, ##F##. I might have made a mistake... so we should wait for a second opinion!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
whats an elliptic integral
Try writing down potential using distance d in post #2 with integration via ##\phi## then you will find it.
 
anuttarasammyak said:
You can take the ring as
x^2+y^2=R^2 or
(x,y,z)=(R \cos\phi,R \sin\phi,0),\ 0<\phi<2\pi
and P
(P_x,P_y,P_z)=(r\sin\theta, 0, r \cos\theta)
Then you can calculate the distance between.
here I think you have taken your coordinate system along the ring hence your can write the eq x^2+y^2=R^2
I don't understand how you got
(x,y,z)=(R \cos\phi,R \sin\phi,0),\ 0<\phi<2\pi and what angle phi is over here.

(P_x,P_y,P_z)=(r\sin\theta, 0, r \cos\theta)
if you write the coordinate of point p with origin at the center of the ring and the y-axis along the radii of the ring, how will
Py = 0
 
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
and what angle phi is over here.
##\phi## is the angle around the ring from its intersection with the x-axis to an element of the ring of mass ##M\frac{d\phi}{2\pi}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hamiltonian
etotheipi said:
Is it possible to obtain an algebraic expression?
The question statement leaves the possibility that an integral expression is acceptable as an answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
  • #10
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
if you write the coordinate of point p with origin at the center of the ring and the y-axis along the radii of the ring, how will
Py = 0
y axis is chosen so that it is orthogonal to OP.
If we choose x-axis is orthogonal, ##P_x=0,P_y=r\sin\theta## instead.
 
  • #11
i am unable to come up with an equation for a tilted circle
 
  • #12
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
i am unable to come up with an equation for a tilted circle

You don't need to find an equation for the tilted circle; you can just construct a new coordinate system ##\mathcal{F'} = \{O; \hat{x}', \hat{y}', \hat{z}'\}## with the same origin but just rotated so that the ring occupies a plane orthogonal to ##\hat{z}'##. Then you can just transform the coordinates of your point P into the new coordinate system (easiest with a diagram). That is what @anuttarasammyak did in #2.

If you really want to find the equation of a tilted circle, you could also try to look at it as the intersection of the sphere ##x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = R^2## and the plane defined by ##y=-\tan{(\theta)}x##. Or you could use a coordinate transformation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
i am unable to come up with an equation for a tilted circle
Instead of a tilted circle and horizontal OP in your figure, in post #2 I take the flat ( or perpendicular ) circle and tilted OP to it by turning them by ##-\theta##.
 
  • #14
I did this by introducing an angle phi to represent the angle subtended by the ring. You can use this angle phi and theta to come up with separate expressions for x, y, and z along an axis whose origin is at the bottom of the ring touching the surface. You can use this angle to express the position where you want the potential as some value "x" plus the part of the ring that's has a length in this "x" direction and similarly for y and z. Although I set my coordinate system differently the answers should still work out. Keep in mind this way you have to do an approximation namely that x >>R. Also are you sure you need a differential equation for this? Just use the expression for potential energy and split up M as dM = pdA where p is the density (M/2piR) and dA is the area element (actually you only need a line element) and you can integrate over phi. *Update that is not actually the same as what you did because the potential was calculated at a distance from the base of the ring but this same method will give the correct answer for your problem if the distance is taken from the center of the ring.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
836
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K