Calculating Height for Shaun White's Snowboarding Trick

  • Thread starter Thread starter green123
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
13 replies · 2K views
green123
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How much height above the half pipe does 85kg Shaun White need to complete the 3.5 second trick?


Homework Equations


d=.5(vi+vf)t
net force= ma
pe=mgh
vf= vi+at


The Attempt at a Solution


no
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What kinematics equations do you know? What information does the problem give you, and is there anything else you know? You must try to answer the question before we can help.
 
You can solve for his exit-velocity using one of your listed equations and the relationship between [itex]v_f[/itex] and [itex]v_i[/itex], since acceleration and time are both known.

Then use one of the kinematic equations (perhaps one that relates distance to velocity and acceleration? :wink:) to find how high he goes.
 
gdbb said:
You can solve for his exit-velocity using one of your listed equations and the relationship between [itex]v_f[/itex] and [itex]v_i[/itex], since acceleration and time are both known.

Then use one of the kinematic equations (perhaps one that relates distance to velocity and acceleration? :wink:) to find how high he goes.

What is the acceleration?
 
What pulls him back down into the halfpipe? :)
 
oooohhhh ookk... Thanks!
so it would be
Vf=0+9.8(3.5)
Vf=34.3
D=.5(0+34.3)3.5
D=60m
right?
 
green123 said:
oooohhhh ookk... Thanks!
so it would be
Vf=0+9.8(3.5)
Vf=34.3
D=.5(0+34.3)3.5
D=60m
right?

Almost! But not quite. His initial velocity will be the velocity he has when he leaves the halfpipe, so it will not be zero. What's the relationship between the velocity at which he leaves the halfpipe and the velocity at which he re-enters the halfpipe? (Hint: Assume air resistance is negligible and energy is conserved)

Also consider using a different kinematic equation to find the distance (we have velocity and acceleration and want to find his MAXIMUM distance).
 
gdbb said:
Almost! But not quite. His initial velocity will be the velocity he has when he leaves the halfpipe, so it will not be zero. What's the relationship between the velocity at which he leaves the halfpipe and the velocity at which he re-enters the halfpipe? (Hint: Assume air resistance is negligible and energy is conserved)

Also consider using a different kinematic equation to find the distance (we have velocity and acceleration and want to find his MAXIMUM distance).

is the initial velocity 34.3m/s?
 
If nothing acts on him except for gravity when he's doing his trick, what can we conclude about his velocity upon re-entering the halfpipe in terms of the velocity when he leaves the halfpipe?
 
gdbb said:
If nothing acts on him except for gravity when he's doing his trick, what can we conclude about his velocity upon re-entering the halfpipe in terms of the velocity when he leaves the halfpipe?

that his velocity is 9.8m/s
 
We're not looking for a number for [itex]v_i[/itex] yet -- we'll solve for that later. We want to find a relationship between that and [itex]v_f[/itex]. Does this equation hold true:

[itex]v_f = v_i[/itex]?

Well of course not, because velocity has a direction and magnitude. The directions clearly are opposite, and what can we say about the magnitudes?
 
gdbb said:
We're not looking for a number for [itex]v_i[/itex] yet -- we'll solve for that later. We want to find a relationship between that and [itex]v_f[/itex]. Does this equation hold true:

[itex]v_f = v_i[/itex]?

Well of course not, because velocity has a direction and magnitude. The directions clearly are opposite, and what can we say about the magnitudes?

so vf =0?
 
I think I'm doing a bad job at explaining this, so I'll help you out. If all energy is conserved, then at the height of the exit of the halfpipe between [itex]t = 0[/itex] and [itex]t = 3.5[/itex],

[itex]\Delta E = 0[/itex]

And thus,

[itex]\Delta KE = \frac{1}{2} m(v_f^2 - v_i^2) = 0[/itex]

Which, as a result, gives us:

[itex]|v_f| = |v_i|[/itex]

The only difference is that [itex]v_i[/itex] is going the opposite direction, so:

[itex]v_f = -v_i[/itex]

Now try to solve for [itex]v_f[/itex] numerically using your kinematic equation.
 
Last edited:
ok, i think i got it, thanks for your help!