Calculating inductance -- Mystery units?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of inductance for a motor based on torque and angular speed, referencing a peer-reviewed journal paper. The user encounters imaginary inductance values due to a problematic subtraction within the square root of their calculations. Despite the confusion, the user notes that the published figure shows a valid inductance value, raising questions about the accuracy of their own calculations. The discrepancy lies in the evaluation of parameters, particularly the relationship between variables used in the equation. The conversation highlights the importance of verifying calculations against published results to resolve inconsistencies.
Jamie1234
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Corroborating the output of a trivial equation
Hello.
I would like to replicate the plot (a figure) provided in an example. The example is presented in a journal paper and shows the calculation for the inductance of a motor with known torque and angular speed.
Below is the figure, and the table of parameters provided in the paper

1729664363257.png

1729664542237.png

Border 2 in the above figure is given by equation 10, below:
1729672998679.png

Calculating the inductance for the values of magnetic flux 0.24:0.05:0.260 as shown in the Figure, we obtain the values:
La_10 = 0.0000 + 0.0115i, 0.0000 + 0.0118i, 0.0000 + 0.0120i, 0.0000 + 0.0123i and 0.0000 + 0.0126i
Am I going mad?? :/ .

Code snippet:
N_a = 1500 % Speed [RPM]
Ta = 10 % Torque [Nm]
I_am = 20 % Armature current limit [A]
V_om = 100 % induced voltage limit [V]
V_lim = 160 % Voltage limit of inverter [V]
Flux_PM = [0.240:0.005:0.260]
La_10 = 1 / I_am * sqrt((V_om/N_a)^2 - Flux_PM.^2)
plot(Flux_PM, La)
 

Attachments

  • 1729664414363.png
    1729664414363.png
    16.7 KB · Views: 50
  • 1729664441274.png
    1729664441274.png
    16.7 KB · Views: 49
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
Jamie1234 said:
Am I going mad?? :/ .
You have imaginary inductance values, so it may drive you mad.

I suspect the subtraction within the square root is doing that to you. You will need to check the absolute values of those variables before subtraction, one or both of them would appear to be wrong. Is one dependent on the other, and you are not evaluating that deeper dependency ?
 
Hi Bluncore. Thanks for your reply. Yes, mad as a hatter.

Yes, it's the subtraction in the square root as you mention. What gives me pause / confuses me; the paper was peer reviewed and published, the figure was constructed, and the results validated (in the paper). So it must be I that is mad..?

However; looking at the figure and table.
If we take a value on the x axis (flux linkage), say.. psi_a = 0.240, and from the table (and equation) we have, omega_base = Na = 1500 [RPM], and v_om = 100 [V], we obtain:
sqrt( ( v_om / omega_base)^2 - 0.240^2) = sqrt( (100 / 1500)^2 - 0.240^2) = sqrt( 0.0044 - 0.0576).

And yet, in the figure, for psi_a = 0.240 we have a value for the inductance of ~ 10.5 e-3 (shown in the figure to be the first point of boundary 2).

So who's crazy? and how has this magical value been obtained I wonder.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top