Calculating Initial Velocity of a Projectile Using Free Fall Equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the initial speed of a stone thrown upward at an angle of 51° with a maximum height of 26 m. The context is centered around projectile motion and the application of kinematic equations and conservation of energy principles.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of vertical and horizontal components of motion, questioning how to apply acceleration and maximum height to find initial velocity.
  • Some participants explore the conservation of energy as an alternative method to solve the problem.
  • There are inquiries about the relevance of certain equations and the correct interpretation of acceleration in the context of projectile motion.
  • Questions arise regarding the necessity of accounting for the angle in calculations and how to combine vertical and horizontal components for the final answer.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various approaches being considered. Some participants have provided guidance on focusing on vertical motion and the implications of using conservation of energy. There is an acknowledgment of misunderstandings regarding the application of certain equations and the role of acceleration in the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of projectile motion, including the effects of gravity and the need to separate components of motion. There is a recognition of potential confusion surrounding the use of circular motion equations in a non-circular context.

a18c18
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A stone is thrown upward at an angle of 51° above the horizontal. Its maximum height during the trajectory is 26 m. What was the stone's initial speed?
m/s

Homework Equations



a=v2/r
v2=vo2+2ax
C=2[tex]\pi[/tex]r

The Attempt at a Solution



I figured the acceleration is 9.81*sin51 since it just gravity when thrown upward so now I have to account for gravity.
so a=7.62

I plugged this into a=v2/r in order to find velocity:
7.62=v2/26
so v=14.079

The distance I got by using the equation C=2[tex]\pi[/tex]r
I got that C=163.36 and the distance is 1/4th of the circumference since the ground and highest point are perpendicular. I got 40.84 for the distance

I then plugged my answers for a, v and distance into v2=vo2+2ax to find initial velocity
I got that v=20.596 but this was incorrect. Does anyone know what I did wrong?
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Almost correct approach, consider the vertical component of the motion.
You know the vertical accelration and maximum height - you can then work out the vertical component of the initial speed.
Alternatively you can use conservation of energy.
 
Okay so the vertical component of acceleration would be 9.81*cos51 right?

And then plug this into v2=vo2+2ax using 26 for x?

And how do I get the answer from the vertical and horizontal components of the initial speed?
 
a18c18 said:
Okay so the vertical component of acceleration would be 9.81*cos51 right?

No! Draw a picture and think first!
 
Moreover, your equations C=2\pi r and a=v^2/r are irrelevant: the stone does not follow a circular path
 
Okay thank you. I tried a new approach using the conservation of energy and the formula Ki+Ui=Kf+Uf.
This would be 1/2mVi^2+mgh=1/2mVf^2+mgh.
1/2mVi^2+m(9.81 cos 51)*0=1/2*0^2+m(9.81 cos 51)*26
1/2mVi^2=m(9.81 cos 51)*26
So after the masses cancel out, Vi should be 17.9 m/s
Did I do this correctly?
 
You have to lose this idea the the acceleration is cos(51).
Vertically the accelration is 9.81m/s^2 downward (or -9.81m/s^2 up if you prefer)
The horizontal accelaration is zero.
 
So I don't need to account for the angle any where in the problem?

Other than the acceleration is there anything else wrong my work?
 
You need to account for the angle in converting the vertical and horizontal velocities back into a velocity along the line for the final answer.

A really nice feature about forces is that you can split them up into components, deal with them separately and simply add them back together correctly.
So in this case we simplify it by looking at the vertical component where you know the final velocity, accelration and distance. If you had been given the total horizontla distance and time you could work out the speed using the horizontal part and ignore the vertical motion completely.

Most people find conservation of energy simpler to understand than forces - and it's much harder to get the signs wrong.
 
  • #10
Okay thank you. so if I use the formula Ki+Ui=Kf+Uf I don't need to multiply gravity by cos(angle)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K