Calculating Lead Shielding Thickness for Radioactive Sample Transport

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the lead shielding thickness required for transporting a 100 mCi sample of 212Pb to ensure a maximum dose level of 10 mR per day. The half-life of 212Pb is 11 hours, with each gamma disintegration yielding 0.24 MeV. The mass energy absorption coefficient for lead is 0.48 cm²/g, and its density is 11.4 g/cm³. A correction was made regarding the mass energy coefficient of air, changing the final calculated thickness to 1.2 cm.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radiation shielding principles
  • Familiarity with the inverse square law of radiation
  • Knowledge of gamma radiation properties and measurements
  • Basic calculations involving half-life and energy absorption coefficients
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of the inverse square law in radiation shielding
  • Study the effects of different materials on gamma radiation attenuation
  • Learn about the calculation methods for radiation dose rates
  • Explore the implications of half-life on radioactive material transport
USEFUL FOR

Radiation safety professionals, health physicists, and anyone involved in the transport of radioactive materials will benefit from this discussion.

habman_6
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello, i have to do a problem for a written problem set:

1. Shielding. The transport of radioactive samples must follow strict guidelines to ensure that the exposure is very low. A 100 mCi sample of 212Pb is placed at the centre of a cubical lead lined box, each side of which has a length of 30cm. Calculate the thickness of lead required to reduce the dose level at the surface of the box to 10mR per day at most. The half-life of 212Pb is 11 hours, and each gamma disintegration yields 0.24 MeV; the mass energy absorption coefficient for lead at this energy is 0.48 cm2g-1, and its density is 11.4 g.cm-3. (Make the simplest reasonable assumption you can, and provide a full explanation).

Am i right in the "simple assumption" that the air does not affect the dose level, so this way the dose at each point along the surface of the cube would be equal (since distance from the sample would not matter). Then using this surface area i could continue to solve for fluence, etc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
habman_6 said:
Am i right in the "simple assumption" that the air does not affect the dose level, so this way the dose at each point along the surface of the cube would be equal (since distance from the sample would not matter). Then using this surface area i could continue to solve for fluence, etc.

You can make the assumtion that the air will not affect the intensity of the radiation. However, this does not mean that the dose at each point on the surface of the cube will be equal. The instenity of radiation varies with distance in accordance to the inverse square law, therefore that distance will still affect the intenisty of the radiation.

-Hoot:smile:
 
This is what I did. Can someone confirm so i can settle my feelings? :redface:

Also, I scanned this before i caught a conversion error for the mass energy coefficient of air, it should be 0.0027 instead of 0.027, which changes the answer to 1.2cm.
 

Attachments

  • Nuclear Physics - 1.jpg
    Nuclear Physics - 1.jpg
    10.4 KB · Views: 596
  • Nuclear Physics - 2.jpg
    Nuclear Physics - 2.jpg
    13.5 KB · Views: 491
  • Nuclear Physics - 3.jpg
    Nuclear Physics - 3.jpg
    10.6 KB · Views: 538
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
20K