MHB Calculating Likelihood of Proposal Passage in Council Vote of 9 Members

tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
In a council vote for a proposal, there a nine council members. There is a 60% chance that each council person will vote in favour of the proposal. What is then likelihood that the proposal will pass?

So, this means that 5 or greater members must vote in favour.

These are independent events, so the odds that 5 vote in favour is $0.6 * 0.6 * 0.6 * 0.6 * 0.6 = 0.07776$,
that 6 vote in favour is $0.6 * 6 = 0.046$, that 7 vote in favour is $0.6 ^ 7 = 0.0279 $, that 8 vote in favour is $0.6 ^ 8 = 0.0167$ and that 9 vote in favour is $0.01$. Add all these up and I get 0.177 percent.

So this is incorrect, how do I fix my calculation to make it correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For each particular number of yes votes, let's say there are $k$ yes votes, and so $9-k$ no votes, we have to compute how many ways there are to choose $k$ from $9$ and then multiply that by the probability for one particular way to make that choice:

$${9 \choose k}(0.6)^k(0.4)^{9-k}$$

And then, calling the event that it passes $X$, to find the probability of $X$ happening, we need to sum these up for $k=5$ to $k=9$:

$$P(X)=\sum_{k=5}^{9}\left({9 \choose k}(0.6)^k(0.4)^{9-k}\right)$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top