Calculating Logarithms Before Calculators: History & Methods

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter assuredlonewo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 3K views
assuredlonewo
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
How were logarithms calculated before the use of calculators.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here's an iterative method to approximate it. For instance:

Assume you want to calculate logab, where a and b are positive numbers. So you want to find x such that ax = b. From visual inspection, pick a point y so that you're sure that ay < b and a point z so that az > b.

Now consider w = (y+z)/2 (which is the midpoint between y and z). One of three things will happen:

1) aw < b

2) aw > b

3) aw = b

If aw < b, take the midpoint between w and z and repeat. If aw > b, take the midpoint between w and y and repeat. If aw = b, then you're done(though this will probably not happen).

Keep repeating until you're within a certain epsilon of b.

_____

You can also look at the taylor series expansion around a certain point and cut it off past a certain point. This might be more work though.
 
assuredlonewo said:
How were logarithms calculated before the use of calculators.

Before electronic pocket calculators became common, every engineering student owned one of these ...
powerlog.jpg


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slide_rule
 
Yes, but you needed to know the value of the logarithms in order to make a slide rule.

I can't speak for what was done historically, but you could use the Taylor's series for the logarithm:
[tex]ln(x)= \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n}(x- 1)^n[/tex]

Ahh!
On "Math Forum- Ask Dr. Math"
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/52469.html
they have
Instead of taking powers of a number close to 1, as had
Napier, Briggs began with log(10) = 1 and then found other logarithms
by taking successive roots. By finding sqrt(10) = 3.162277 for
example, Briggs had log(3.162277) = 0.500000, and from 10^(3/4) =
sqrt(31.62277) = 5.623413 he had log(5.623413) = 0.7500000.
Continuing in this manner, he computed other common logarithms.
Briggs published his tables of logarithms of numbers from 1 to 1000,
each carried out to 14 places of decimals, in 1617.
 
If you needed more then the 3 digit accuracy of a slide rule you opened a book of log tables. We were even taught to do a linear interpolation to get values between tabulated values.

Halls post is the answer to how did they generate the tables.