MHB Calculating Logistic Growth Rate

Click For Summary
To calculate the logistic growth rate, the equation X = AB^Y is relevant, where X represents the population and Y the year. The growth factor B can be determined using B = X2/X1 for successive years. A linear regression of log X against Y can help identify the relationship, but the significant jump in population in 2015 raises concerns about treating the data as logistic growth. This anomaly suggests the possibility of an error in the 2015 data, indicating that further investigation is needed. Understanding the cause of this spike is crucial for accurate growth rate calculations.
andre6051
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a logistic growth problem. I know this because there is an upper limit of approximately 21,000 people. I need to calculate growth rate. Would it be something as simple as taking two populations and dividing them to get the rate (X2-X1/X1) to obtain it or is there an equation I am missing? I feel like the growth rate is harder to find than that. Plus, for some reason, the number shot up in 2015 and I don't know what to do. The only info I have is below. Thanks!

Example

X Y
44 2010
61 2011
79 2012
208 2013
326 2014
6663 2015
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
andre6051 said:
I have a logistic growth problem. I know this because there is an upper limit of approximately 21,000 people. I need to calculate growth rate. Would it be something as simple as taking two populations and dividing them to get the rate (X2-X1/X1) to obtain it or is there an equation I am missing? I feel like the growth rate is harder to find than that. Plus, for some reason, the number shot up in 2015 and I don't know what to do. The only info I have is below. Thanks!

Example

X Y
44 2010
61 2011
79 2012
208 2013
326 2014
6663 2015

Hi andre6051! Welcome to MHB! (Smile)

It looks like Y is a year and X increases exponentially.
So the relevant equation would be $X=AB^Y$ so that $\frac {X_2}{X_1} = \frac{AB^{Y_2}}{AB^{Y_1}} = B^{Y_2 - Y_1}$.
For successive years that means $B = \frac {X_2}{X_1}$.

It also means that $\log X = \log A + Y \log B$.
Typically we would find a linear regression between $\log X$ and $Y$ to figure out the relation.

Then again, as you already noticed, in 2015 the number shot up, causing an outlier.
We should get more information why that is, since it may mean we can't treat it as a logistic growth problem.
Can it be that the last X should really be, say, 663? Maybe there is a typo...
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K