Calculating Maximum Height of a Hanging Block on a Pulley System

  • Thread starter Thread starter jphillip
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blocks Pully
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two blocks of different masses (2.2 kg and 3.2 kg) connected by a pulley system. The original poster seeks to calculate the maximum height the smaller block reaches after the system is released, given that the blocks are initially hanging at a height of 1.80 m from the ground.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods to determine the acceleration of the system and the subsequent velocity of the smaller block. There are questions about the validity of the formulas used and the reasoning behind them. Some participants suggest using conservation of energy as an alternative approach.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's calculations and suggesting different approaches. There is recognition of the need for clarity on the formulas used, and some participants express uncertainty about their understanding of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes they have not yet covered conservation of energy in their class, which may limit their ability to fully engage with some of the suggestions made in the discussion.

jphillip
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
two blocks (2.2kg and 3.2kg) both hanging 1.80 m from the ground on a pulley(massless / frictionless) that is 4.80 m from the ground.

What is the maximum height the smaller block (2.2kg) reaches, when the system is released?

It appears that I need to find its velocity first of the system as the 3.2kg falls 1.8 m to the ground.
(3.2kg-2.2kg) / (3.2kg+2.2kg) = .185g * (9.8m/s2) = 1.81 m/s2

Then once the big block hits the ground, calc the additional height of the little block will rise additionally from the velocity created.

v2 - v2i / 2 (g)
1.812 / 2(9.8 m/s2) = .168 m + 1.8m (initial drop / increase)

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi jphillip! welcome to pf! :smile:
jphillip said:
(3.2kg-2.2kg) / (3.2kg+2.2kg) = .185g * (9.8m/s2) = 1.81 m/s2

where did you get this formula from? :confused:

(it's only partly correct :redface:)

(your second formula is fine)
 
I got the first formula from an example in my book that appeared to be calculating what I thought I needed. An elevator question, what did I miss or am I missing
 
thought so! :rolleyes:

always work out the formula yourself :wink:

what should it be? :smile:
 
I believe F = ma which worked out a = F/m
So
3.2kg - 2.2kg = 1kg * 9.8 = F
(3.2 + 2.2) = m ? (not sure here)

I think
 
jphillip said:
I believe F = ma …

well, that certainly would work, but you want v not a …

so it's quicker to use conservation of energy :wink:
 
O.K.

V2 = 2(1.81m/s2)(1.80m)
 
jphillip said:
O.K.

V2 = 2(1.81m/s2)(1.80m)

yes! :biggrin:
 
So that gets me the velocity2 I would then have to solve for the additional distance correct
 
  • #10
yes :smile:

(same method as you used at the start)
 
  • #11
\sqrt{2*1.81*1.80} = v = 2.55

2.552 / (2*9.8m/s2) = y = .332 + 3.6 (1.80(starting height)+1.80 accl height)

total height 3.93m
 
  • #12
i'm finding it difficult to follow this without any formulas :redface:

(and why did you bother to square-root that, when you were only going to square it again immediately after? :confused:)
 
  • #13
Here are the formulas that I have used... initial height = 1.80m
N - Newtons
kg - kilograms
(Block 1 31.31N - Block 2 21.56N) / (block 1 3.3kg + block 2 2.2kg) = a

So
(31.36N - 21.56N) / (3.2kg + 2.2kg) = 1.8148 m/s2

Then solve for Velocity using v2 = v2i + 2a(y)

V2= 0 + 2(1.8148m/s2)(1.80) = 6.5338 which is velocity not squared

Now solve for the actual distance using the same formula on
v = 6.5338 (not squared from above)
a = 9.8 gravity
v / 2(a) = y

6.5338 / 2(9.8) = .332 which should be the height of the lighter block 2.2kg with momentum after the 3.2 kg block hits the ground.
 
  • #14
hi jphillip! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)

i think you have the correct result, but what do you mean by "not squared"? :confused:

that 6.53338 is v2

have you done conservation of energy in class (KE + PE = constant)?

you can avoid finding the acceleration by using mgh - Mgh = (m + M)v2/2
 
  • #15
I have not made it to conservation of energy in Class. Thanks for the help I am sure I will be back for more. I am really enjoying this class, just not the summer version of I believe LOL.
 
  • #16
jphillip said:
I have not made it to conservation of energy in Class.

ok, that's something to look forward to! :biggrin:

just to recap, your equations (without conservation of energy) should have been

(F = ma): mg - T = ma, Mg - T = -Ma, so (subtracting) (m-M)g = (m+M)a, or a = (m-M)/(m+M)

v2 = 2as1

v2 = 2gs2 :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K