Calculating Moment of Inertia: What Does 'r' Refer To?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the concept of moment of inertia in the context of dynamics, particularly in relation to a 2D game development scenario. The original poster seeks clarification on the meaning of 'r' in the moment of inertia formulas.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of 'r' in the moment of inertia equations, questioning whether it refers to the radius of the body or the distance from the point of rotation to the center of mass. There is also discussion about the implications of these definitions on the calculation of moment of inertia.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights regarding the interpretation of 'r', suggesting it is the distance from the axis of rotation to a specific point on the body. However, there remains uncertainty about how to apply this understanding to rigid bodies and the calculation of their moment of inertia.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses confusion about the implications of different interpretations of 'r' and how to effectively calculate the moment of inertia for a rigid body in a game context, indicating a need for further exploration of the topic.

Eeduh
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to teach myself some physics (dynamics in this case) and there's something I don't really get. It's how to calculate the moment of inertia.
I know the standard formula is I = m*r^2 for point masses, and I = (1/3)*m*r^2 for rigid bodies with equally divided mass, which is the case I'm interested in (I'm working on some 2d game, that's why).

Now can someone tell me what the 'r' is really referring to? Some lectures speak of the radius of the body, but I think that would be silly because then it would be the same for every point of rotation.

Is it then the distance from the point of rotation to the center of mass? This seems kind of logical, because the further away the point of rotation is from the center of mass, the more torque it'll require to rotate the object. But this would also mean that when the point of rotation is the same as the center of mass (which will be the case in many situations), moment of inertia would be 0 for r = 0, which would mean the object is infinitely easy to rotate. Makes no sense either.

Then what is r referring to? I hope someone can give me the answer.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the equation you give, r refers to the distance from the axis of rotation.
 
Allright thanks, that's at least one step in the right direction. But the distance from the axis of rotation to what? CM? Because there's a problem with that which I've already described in my first post..
 
The distance from the axis of rotation to the point on the body that you are considering.

If you're considering a point mass, as you say in the first part of your first post, then r will be the distance from the mass to the axis which you are rotating the mass about.
 
Hmm I still don't really get it.. perhaps I should read some more on the subject. Thanks anyway.
 
Yeah I get it now but there remains a problem. For a rigid body, you theoretically have to sum up all the point moments of inertia. But how am I going to approach this then? For a 2d rigid body in a game, this would mean dividing the mass by the amount of pixels the object is built from, calculation the point moment of inertia for each pixel and summing it up again? There must be a better and more accurate way. please help?:confused:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K