Calculating μs of a Car: Understanding Acceleration and Friction

  • Thread starter Thread starter TAN6
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the coefficient of static friction (μs) for a car based on its acceleration and stopping distance. The car, with a mass of 1810 kg, accelerates to 80 km/h (22.2 m/s) in 10 seconds, resulting in an acceleration of 2.22 m/s². The calculated μs is 0.22, derived from the formula μs = ma/mg. Participants clarify that μs pertains to the friction between the tires and the road, emphasizing the importance of considering both the acceleration and coasting phases in the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law (F = ma)
  • Basic knowledge of kinematics, specifically the equations of motion
  • Familiarity with the concept of static friction and its calculation
  • Ability to perform unit conversions (e.g., km/h to m/s)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of static vs. kinetic friction in vehicle dynamics
  • Learn about the effects of weight distribution on μs in different driving conditions
  • Explore advanced kinematic equations for varying acceleration scenarios
  • Investigate the role of tire composition and road surface in determining μs
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in vehicle dynamics and performance optimization.

TAN6
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Find μs of the car.
- A Car takes 10 seconds to accelerate to 80km before the driver shifts the car into neutral.
- The cars mass = 1810kg
- The car coats 0.9km before coming to a complete stop.
- The total time = 86 seconds.

Here is the work I have done.

μs = ma/mg
to find a
V2 = V1 +at
22.2 = 0 +a10
a = 2.22m/s2

μs = 1810 * 2.22 / 1810 * 9.8
μs = 0.22


Does this make sense. This is the μs for the road right? How can I find it for the car? I figure I need to use the total distance it travel for something but I'm not sure how. Any help is welcome

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TAN6 said:
Here is the work I have done.

μs = ma/mg

I'm not sure I understand this. You're saying that the coefficient of friction multiplied by the normal force (which is just equal to the weight of the car in this case) is equal to some force, i.e.:

[tex]\mu_s mg = F[/tex]

But why should this "F" be the net force on the car, ma?
TAN6 said:
to find a
V2 = V1 +at
22.2 = 0 +a10
a = 2.22m/s2

This looks reasonable, assuming constant acceleration.

TAN6 said:
Does this make sense. This is the μs for the road right? How can I find it for the car?

Umm...:rolleyes:...a frictional force is a force that opposes the motion of two surfaces in contact that are trying to slide relative to each other. So it only makes sense to speak of a coeffcient of friction between two surfaces. In this case, the only [itex]\mu[/itex] you could calculate would be the coefficient of friction between the tires and the road (i.e. the coefficient of friction for rubber on asphalt). It doesn't make sense to speak of mu only for the car, or only for the road. Are you sure this is the exact wording of the problem?EDIT: Ohhhh! I think I understand. In this case, the frictional force is the forward force of the road on the tires that causes the car to move forward instead of its tires just spinning in place, right? So that explains why you were setting the frictional force F equal to ma! It also explains why you were using the coefficient of static friction rather than kinetic friction (the two surfaces never actually slide relative to each other...unless the tires lose traction). Okay, in that case, I think you are on the right track, but you need to address the coasting phase of the trip too...not just the initial phase in which the engine is powering the car. During this phase, the situation is slightly different, right?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
7K