MHB Calculating New Emission Rate of Radioactive Source

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the new emission rate of a radioactive source that initially emits particles at a rate of 1 per second, with emissions following a Poisson distribution. It is established that the probability of 0 or 1 emission in 4 seconds is 0.8, leading to the calculation of the new rate, which is approximately 0.206 emissions per second. The calculation involves using the Poisson probability formula, resulting in a new average of 0.824 emissions in 4 seconds. Participants also discuss methods for arriving at this value, including the use of online calculators and Poisson distribution tables. The conversation highlights the mathematical approach to determining changes in emission rates.
araz1
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A radioactive source emits particles at an average rate of 1 pe second. Assume that the number of emissions follows a Poisson distribution. The emission rate changes such that the probability of 0 or 1 emission in 4 seconds becomes 0.8. What is the new rate? Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
araz said:
A radioactive source emits particles at an average rate of 1 pe second. Assume that the number of emissions follows a Poisson distribution. The emission rate changes such that the probability of 0 or 1 emission in 4 seconds becomes 0.8. What is the new rate? Thanks.

Hi araz, welcome to MHB! ;)

We have:
$$P(\text{0 or 1 emission in 4 seconds})=0.8 \\ \implies
P(\text{0 emission in 4 seconds}) + P(\text{1 emission in 4 seconds}) = \frac{\lambda^0 e^{-\lambda}}{0!} + \frac{\lambda^1 e^{-\lambda}}{1!} = (1+\lambda)e^{-\lambda} = 0.8 \\ \implies
\lambda \approx 0.824
$$
So the average number of emissions in 4 seconds is $0.824$, which is $0.206$ per second.
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Hi araz, welcome to MHB! ;)

We have:
$$P(\text{0 or 1 emission in 4 seconds})=0.8 \\ \implies
P(\text{0 emission in 4 seconds}) + P(\text{1 emission in 4 seconds}) = \frac{\lambda^0 e^{-\lambda}}{0!} + \frac{\lambda^1 e^{-\lambda}}{1!} = (1+\lambda)e^{-\lambda} = 0.8 \\ \implies
\lambda \approx 0.824
$$
So the average number of emissions in 4 seconds is $0.824$, which is $0.206$ per second.

Thank you Klaas. Did you use guess and check or numerical methods to get 0.824?
Regards
 
araz said:
Thank you Klaas. Did you use guess and check or numerical methods to get 0.824?
Regards

I used an online calculator to find it.
Alternatively guessing can work, or we can look it up in a Poisson distribution table.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top