Calculating Oscillation Frequency and Max Acceleration of a String

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the oscillation frequency and maximum acceleration of a string subjected to a mass of 300g, with a previously determined spring constant (k) of 23 kN/m. The frequency is derived using the formula f = 1/(2π * √(m/k)), where m is the mass and k is the spring constant. The user questions whether the spring constant should change when the string is pulled down an additional 8 cm for oscillation, concluding that k remains constant at 23 kN/m unless otherwise specified.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law (F = kx)
  • Familiarity with oscillation formulas (T = 1/f = 2π√(m/k))
  • Basic knowledge of mass and force calculations (mg)
  • Concept of spring constant (k) in oscillatory motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of varying spring constants in oscillatory systems
  • Explore the effects of damping on oscillation frequency
  • Learn about energy conservation in oscillating systems
  • Investigate the relationship between amplitude and maximum acceleration in harmonic motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone studying harmonic motion and oscillatory systems will benefit from this discussion.

Tangeton
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
For the first part of the equation, I worked out k constant of a string which extended 12.6cm when a mass of 300g was suspended from it using the equation F = kx where F is the force applied and x its extension.
So mg = xk, 300 x 9,81 = 0.126k, the answer was 23357N/m (23kN/m).

The question then says that the string is pulled down by 8.0cm and released, and so it starts oscillating. It then asks me about the frequency that the mass oscillates and the maximum acceleration of the mass.

For the frequency, T = 1/f = 2(pi) * sqrt of m/k , and so f = 1/(2(pi) * sqrt of m/k). My problem is that I been given an extension (8cm) but I already got one k constant, so it doesn't seem to me that I need to work out another k constant because isn't k constant only dependent on the real length of the string, not if the length os extended for oscillations? I guess what I am asking is what would be the k constant in this case: the previous k constant (23kN/m) or the new k constant worked out using 8cm instead of 12.6cm?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have no further information to the contrary, you may assume k is constant. (and it looks as if they didn't tell you how hard it is being pulled down for a further 8 cm extension)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K