Calculating pH: Vinegar and Ammonia Solution Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blazzok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ph
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the pH of a solution after adding vinegar to water, one must understand that pH is defined as -log [H+], which represents the concentration of hydrogen ions. The initial pH of 7 indicates a neutral solution, while vinegar with a pH of 2.4 introduces a significant amount of hydrogen ions, requiring concentration calculations to determine the new pH. To return the pH to 7, ammonia with a pH of 11.6 must be added, necessitating further calculations of the concentrations of both the acid and base in the final mixture. It is crucial to consider that vinegar and ammonia are weak acid/base solutions, meaning simple concentration calculations may not suffice. Understanding these principles will enable the proper calculation of the pH changes in the solution.
Blazzok
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to know how to do the following. If I have 1L of water with a pH of 7 and I add 1mL Vinegar with a pH of 2.4, what will the pH of the solution then be?
I now need to get the pH of the solution back to 7 by adding ammonia which has a pH of 11.6. How much of that do I need to add?


I don't need a solution to the problem, i just need to know the equations so that i can solve this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the definition of pH?
 
CompuChip said:
What is the definition of pH?

pH = please Help?? -.-
 
Hehe, that's not a definition, it's a corollary :P

The pH of a solution is defined as -log [H+], minus the base-10 log of the concentration of H-ions. The trick is now to work with the concentrations. How many moles per litre do you have in both substances? How many when you put it together? Then how much is there in a litre of the new mixture?
 
Just don't forget vinegar and ammonia both mean weak acid/base, so just using concentration won't work.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top