MHB Calculating Probability of Filing >3 Claims Under Insurance Policy

Jason123
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Under an insurance policy, a maximum of of 5 claims may be filed per year by a policy holder. Let
p(n) be the probability that a policyholder files n claims during a given year, where n= 0,1,2,3,4,5. An actuary makes the following observations:
1) p (n) >= p (n+1) for 0<=n <=4
2) the difference between p (n) and p (n+1) is the same for 0 <= n <= 4
3) exactly 40% of policyholders file fewer than 2 claims during a given year.

Calculate the probability that a random policyholder will file more than three claims during a given year.

Can't seem to figure this one out. Any help would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jason123 said:
Under an insurance policy, a maximum of of 5 claims may be filed per year by a policy holder. Let
p(n) be the probability that a policyholder files n claims during a given year, where n= 0,1,2,3,4,5. An actuary makes the following observations:
1) p (n) >= p (n+1) for 0<=n <=4
2) the difference between p (n) and p (n+1) is the same for 0 <= n <= 4
3) exactly 40% of policyholders file fewer than 2 claims during a given year.

Calculate the probability that a random policyholder will file more than three claims during a given year.

Can't seem to figure this one out. Any help would be great.

The answer is all probabilities are .2 each. If a = prob of 0 claims then given your constraints the probabilities are a , a+d, a + 2*d, a+ 3*d and a + 4*d (diff is equal by assumption 2 and is d here). So 5*a + 10*d = 1. Also by 3, a + a + d = 2*a + d = .4. The only soln to these two is d = 0 and a =.2.

If however there was a typo and assumption 3 reads 2 or fewer claims then the second eqn is 3*a + 3*d = .4. Then the solution is a = 1/15 and d= 1/15 so the probs are 1/15, 2/15 ... 5/15. Take your pick -:)
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top