Calculating Properties with ##S##, ##V##, and ##N##

  • Thread starter Thread starter Like Tony Stark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Properties
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating thermodynamic properties using the variables ##S##, ##V##, and ##N##, with a specific interest in deriving expressions for energetic representation. Participants clarify that the course is purely thermodynamics, referencing Callen's Thermodynamics as the textbook. Key equations discussed include the Helmholtz free energy relation and its derivatives to find properties like thermal expansion coefficient (##\alpha##), heat capacity at constant pressure (##c_p##), and isothermal compressibility (##\kappa_T##). Emphasis is placed on careful attention to detail and creativity in deriving these properties from the fundamental equations. Overall, the conversation aims to provide guidance on how to manipulate these thermodynamic relationships effectively.
Like Tony Stark
Messages
182
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
The fundamental equation of a gas is ##A=-aVT^{\frac{5}{2}} e^{\frac{\mu}{RT}}##. Determine ##\alpha##, ##\kappa_T## and ##c_P##, and then find the fundamental equation in energetic representation: ##U(S; V; N)##.
Relevant Equations
##U##: internal energy; ##T##: temperature; ##\mu##: chemical potential; ##R##: ideal gas constant; ##V##: volume; ##N##: number of moles; ##\alpha##: coefficient of thermal expansion; ##c_P##: heat capacity at constant pressure; ##\kappa_T##: compressibility at constant temperature.

##\alpha=\frac{1}{V} \frac{\partial V}{\partial T}##; ##c_P=\frac{T}{N} \frac{\partial S}{\partial T}## at constant ##P##; ##\kappa_T=\frac{–1}{V} \frac{\partial V}{\partial P}## at constant ##T##
Hi

All the expressions for calculating the properties are given in terms of ##S##, ##V## and ##N##. Should I find the energetic representation and then apply the formulas, or is there another way?

Then, for finding the energetic representation, I know that
##A=U–TS–\mu N##
But I want all these variables to be written in terms of ##S##, ##V## and ##N##. How can I do that? I also know that I can differentiate to obtain the equations of state, but these ones will be written in terms of ##T##, ##V## and ##\mu## too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a stat mech class or a purely thermodynamics class? In other words, do you talk about the grand canonical ensemble at all? We just need a little more context to be helpful to you. :smile:

Edit: I thought the OP made a minus sign error, but I just read the OP's equation wrong. Deleted that correction from my post.
 
Last edited:
Twigg said:
Is this a stat mech class or a purely thermodynamics class? In other words, do you talk about the grand canonical ensemble at all? We just need a little more context to be helpful to you. :smile:

Edit: I thought the OP made a minus sign error, but I just read the OP's equation wrong. Deleted that correction from my post.
Hello! It's from a purely thermodynamics class. The reference book in my course is Callen's Thermodynamics.
 
For ##\alpha##:
The starting point is to remember that ##A = -PV##. In other words, ##V = -\frac{A}{P}##. You know that ##\alpha = \frac{1}{V} \frac{\partial V}{\partial T}## for constant P. To take this derivative, hold ##P## constant and only evaluate the derivative on ##A##. Does that make sense?

For ##c_p##:
You need to calculate the entropy S vs temperature T to use the expression you gave. Recall that ##dA = -PdV - SdT - Nd\mu##. So how do you find S from A? Hint: it's a derivative of the form ##\pm \frac{\partial A}{\partial X}## for some X and some sign (plus or minus).

For ##\kappa_T##:
Start with ##dA = -PdV - SdT - Nd\mu## and set ##dT \rightarrow 0## since you're interested in a constant temperature process. Divide through by ##dP## and make some substitutions to solve for ##\frac{\partial V}{\partial P}##.

These kinds of problems really just rely on careful attention to detail and creativity. You'll find there's a lot of ways to derive ##V=V## doing these. Just be patient, and try different things. As a general procedure, notice that you can get a lot done by starting with ##dA = -PdV - SdT - Nd\mu## and making the right substitutions to solve for some partial derivative or another.

Let us know if the last part is still unclear to you after working these properties out. (And no sweat if it is! These kind of algebra problems can be a pain.)
 
Thanks for your answer!
Let's see if I've understood...
So, for ##\alpha## I have to calculate ## \frac{\partial V}{\partial T}=\frac{\partial}{\partial T}##
##\frac{-aVT^{5/2}e^{\frac{\mu}{RT}}}{P}##, for constant ##P##

Then, for ##c_P##, I have to calculate ##\frac{\partial^2 A}{\partial T^2}## for constant ##P##; and for ##\kappa_T## I have ##\frac{\partial A}{\partial P} + N \frac{\partial \mu}{\partial P}=-P \frac{\partial V}{\partial P}##, for constant ##T##
 
For ##\alpha## that looks good

For ##c_p##, yep!

And for ##\kappa_T## yep that looks good. There might be a cleaner way out there but that's the first step of what I got.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
49
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K