MHB Calculating Radius of Circular Section from Sphere and Plane Intersection

AI Thread Summary
To find the radius of the circular section formed by the intersection of the sphere defined by x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 49 and the plane 2x + 3y - z - 5√14 = 0, one approach is to calculate the distance from the sphere's center to the plane. This distance can be determined using the formula d = |Ax0 + By0 + Cz0 + D| / √(A^2 + B^2 + C^2). Once the distance d is found, the radius r of the circular section can be derived using the right triangle formed by the sphere's radius and the distance to the plane. This method simplifies the problem without needing to substitute z back into the sphere's equation. The final radius of the circular section can then be calculated effectively.
marutkpadhy
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Find the radius of the circular section of the sphere of the sphere x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 49 by the plane 2x+3y-z-5 \sqrt{14}= 0
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Suppose you solve the equation of the plane for $z$, and then substitute for $z$ into the equation of the sphere...what do you get?
 
View attachment 2708

I think it is easier to find the distance $d$ from the center of the sphere to the plane (recall the the distance from $(x_0,y_0,z_0)$ to $Ax+By+Cz+D=0$ is $\dfrac{Ax_0+By_y+Cz_0+D}{\sqrt{A^2+B^2+C^2}}$) and then find the radius $r$ of the required circular section from the right triangle.
 

Attachments

  • circle1.png
    circle1.png
    3.6 KB · Views: 86

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Spherical trig - sphere radius from 6 lengths
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Why is the area of a circular cap on a sphere not equal to πr^2?
Replies
11
Views
7K
B Invariant under rotation: Banal, obvious, or noteworthy?
Replies
2
Views
2K
What Are Conic Sections and How Are They Defined?
Replies
1
Views
4K
MHB Solving the nature of intersection between 3 planes
Replies
6
Views
3K
Finding Volumes of Sphere & Circular Cone: Alpha from 0 to Pi
Replies
3
Views
2K
MHB Where Do These Parametric Equations and Plane Intersect?
Replies
1
Views
2K
MHB Planes 1 & 2 Intersect: Find Scalar Equations
Replies
1
Views
1K
A Finding Minimal Mean Distance Curves on the Unit Sphere
Replies
2
Views
2K
Given a set of solids, compute the inward flux
Replies
3
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top