Given a set of solids, compute the inward flux

  • Thread starter Thread starter DottZakapa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux Set Solids
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the computation of inward flux for a given set of solids defined in three-dimensional space. The subject area includes vector calculus and geometric interpretation of solids such as cylinders and spheres.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to represent the domain defined by a cylinder and a sphere, while also considering the intersection with a plane. They express difficulty in determining the boundaries of integration and finding intersections. Some participants suggest using cylindrical coordinates to simplify the problem, while others discuss the geometric implications of the shapes involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion has seen various approaches to interpreting the problem, including a suggestion to switch to cylindrical coordinates for easier computation. While some participants have provided insights into the geometric configuration, there is no explicit consensus on the final approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of finding intersections and boundaries for integration, indicating a potential area of confusion. The original poster mentions ongoing struggles with these steps, suggesting that clarity on these points is still needed.

DottZakapa
Messages
239
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
Let ##_\Omega \left\{ (x,y,z)\in R^3 : - \sqrt{3-y^2-z^2} \leq x \leq z+2 ,y^2+z^2 \leq 3 \right\} ##
and consider the function
##f(x,y,z)=y^2x+z^2x##

Represent the domain ##\Omega##
compute the vector field ##F=\nabla f##
compute the inward flux.
Relevant Equations
flux integration
Let ##_\Omega \left\{ (x,y,z)\in R^3 : - \sqrt{3-y^2-z^2} \leq x \leq z+2 ,y^2+z^2 \leq 3 \right\} ##
and consider the function
##f(x,y,z)=y^2x+z^2x##

Represent the domain ##\Omega##
compute the vector field ##F=\nabla f##
compute the inward flux.

So I've found that one is a cylinder of radius ##\sqrt 3##
the second figure is a sphere with radius ##\sqrt 3##
then there is a plane passing through z=2 and x=2
the sphere is inside the cylinder, and concerning the sphere i consider just the part above the x axes, can't see how the plane intersect the two

now,
i'm having problems on finding the intersections in order to find also the boundaries of integration, in truth I'm always struggling at this step.
How do I have to proceed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DottZakapa said:
So I've found that one is a cylinder of radius √3\sqrt 3
the second figure is a sphere with radius √3\sqrt 3
then there is a plane passing through z=2 and x=2
You see the sphere is contained in the cylinder. So the domain is the sphere cut by the plane passing the points (-2,y,0) and (0,y,2). Death Star like shape.
 
Last edited:
Someone check me, but is it easiest if you adopt the cylindrical coordinate system as ##x = x, y = r \sin \theta, z = r \cos \theta##? Then you have ##_\Omega \left\{ (x,y,z)\in R^3 : - \sqrt{3-r^2} \leq x \leq r \cos \theta+2 ,r \leq 3 \right\} ## and ##f(x,y,z)=r^2x##.

Then computing ##\nabla f## is straightforward (it's cylindrical coordinates) and the integration bounds would be as I've shown for ##x##, ##\theta \in [0,2\pi]## and ##r \leq 3## (shown above).

If it's confusing, without loss of generality let ##x = z##, which then implies ##- \sqrt{3-r^2} \leq z \leq r\cos \theta+2##, ##f = r^2 z##, and of course ##\theta \in [0,2\pi]##, ##r \in [0,3]##.
 
Thank you all , problem solved and exam passed.
Long life to physics forum
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and mitochan

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K